It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Well it comes down to getting people to do actual research. Problem is most people that beleive the official story are afraid to do research becasue they do not want to know the truth, they want to live in their safe fantasy world.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
reply to post by Taxi-Driver
How much do you think KBR, Haliburton, Exxon-Mobil, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, General Dynamics, etc, etc, have made on the Iraq war????
Do you think it might be a tad bit more than David Ray Griffin and Alex Jones???
C'mon get real!!!
Originally posted by jpm1602
My thing on this.
Who? Put all the puts on the airlines the day before?
We were never entitled to this information.
Who put a huge insurancy policy on the toweres weeks before there takedown?
Let me put it like this again.
If I take out a million dollar policy on my wife. And she turns up dead a month later....I got a lot of 'xplainin' to do.
Follow the MONEY! Always.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Iraq? They were going down regardless of 9/11, supersleuth. The Iraq stuff was an ongoing saga since the eighties.. damn.
How much did American Airlines, United Airlines, Merrill Lynch, Hilton, Wyndham, Chase, Verizon, and countless others LOSE on 9/11? and the years directly folowing 9/11?
Yeah like those companies and their leaders are just goona take-it up the ass-- so "Jack" their country club golf buddy can make some money off their misfortune 6 years later.. THEY would be SCREAMING from the mountaintops.. THEY would be all over the news and in print because they have the voice to do so... NOT a PEEP.. Why? Because it is WEBJUNK of the highest degree.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
reply to post by Taxi-Driver
You don't have to be a supersleuth (just conscious) to see what is happening around you. An oilman and executive VP from haliburton are running the country...who benefits??? I guess that Alex Jones and Dylan Avery in your book.
Silverstien didn't want to have the expensive insurance policy-- He was forced to take it from the underwriters.. Can you imagine a lender leaving that much of an asset UNINSURED?
I don't know about you but in my experience insurance companies are not just gonna roll over and take a huge loss on something unless it is legit-- OR ELSE THEY WOULD BE SCREAMING FROM THE MOUNTAINTOPS.-- and it would be all over the news in print because they have the power to do so.
Let me put it like this again.
If I take out a million dollar policy on my wife. And she turns up dead a month later....I got a lot of 'xplainin' to do.
Follow the MONEY! Always.
So you feel there was no explainin' -- Did you do your "research?' or just accept the first bit of "edgie' propaganda that fell into you lap, without even scrutinizing the source?
Originally posted by jprophet420
Hmmmm, maybe you should look at their stock? Maybe you should look and see how bad the market was doing pre-911. Were you in the market pre-911? I was. It was bad off. The media portrayed 911 as the catalyst to the bad market but as i pointed out in another thread a catalyst cannot happen after an event. That's the spin, and its a lie. AA price to earnings was very low prior to 911 and went back up for half a year (directly after 911) before bottoming out. They peaked again this year and went down again. Did they go down again this year from 911?
WEBJUNK indeed.
Originally posted by jprophet420
Silverstein took out insurance that was so large that he had to pay double deductable. It was questioned pre-911, and he was certainly not forced to do it. He had to get lawyers just to be allowed to take out that much insurance because it was non standard.
Also, if you play follow the money, the 2 entities that made the most off of 911 are Isreal and Blackwater. Not Afghanistan, not Iraq, not Saudi Arabia.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Blackwater is making money of of the Iraq war- not 9/11.
Originally posted by TheBobert
You stated in another thread that you dont believe the US Government was in on 9-11.
So who did it then?
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Blackwater is making money of of the Iraq war- not 9/11.
You crack me up. Iraq may have been an issue for a while, but Saddam was linked by our "glorious" leaders to 9/11 specifically so that we, the sheeple, would accept a "preemptive" (read, aggressive move) strike there.
So yes. Blackwater is profiting from 9/11.
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Originally posted by Taxi-Driver
Blackwater is making money of of the Iraq war- not 9/11.
You crack me up. Iraq may have been an issue for a while, but Saddam was linked by our "glorious" leaders to 9/11 specifically so that we, the sheeple, would accept a "preemptive" (read, aggressive move) strike there.
So yes. Blackwater is profiting from 9/11.
So you missed the whole Desert Storm thing, the whole Gassing the Kurds thing, the whole NON compliance with UN inspectors thing, the whole no fly zone thing, the whole volitile and agressive threat to Saudi thing.. and the whole WMD thing? And you think the Iraqi war is about 9/11?
The Iraqi war is NOT about 9/11.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Where do YOU see evidence that that was not a lie? Seems to me there was none.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by Amaterasu
Where do YOU see evidence that that was not a lie? Seems to me there was none.
As far as WMDs, there were signs of them like the hidden and buried MIG planes and several defectors who have stated that WMDs and material were taken to Syria.
Originally posted by Amaterasu
MIG planes are WMD...? [snicker] Really, though, the WMD were given away to another country? Well then. Let's go get THEM!!!