Of all the buildings in the area a good distance away from WTC 1 and 2, unlike wtc 3 4 5 and 6 which got totalled to warring degrees, how come WTC 7
was the only building in that area to be hit by airplane debries or debries from WTC 1 and 2 catch fire and implode? That is a truly fantastic
coincidence. Has the NIST report an explanation on that, why WTC 7 started burning to begin with with all the surrounding buildings taking minor
damage because of the collapse of 7?
It would seem that if there was nothing left to explain perhaps those responsible of soliciting these reports on building 7 wouldn't feel compelled to
discuss this matter any further. However, this latest development seems to be in response to an ongoing campaign advocating a new investigation into
the 9/11 event, with the additional support of 9/11 victim's families.
I imagine in a new investigation they would not just discuss the structural collapses, but also the involvement of government intelligence, which
would only be appropriate when conducting a proper investigation. Of course here we have the government investigating itself and it's own response to
the 9/11 attacks. Which is why an independent investigation, not solicited by the federal government, would be the best course of action.
on 17-11-2010 by laiguana because: (no reason given)
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.