 |
|
Topic started on 1-7-2008 @ 02:50 PM by burdman30ott6
|
Man accused of strolling in thong, fake breasts
www.philly.com
 MANCHESTER, Conn. - A Manchester man has been arrested after he allegedly strolled along Interstate 291 wearing nothing but a thong, fake
breasts and a wig. Police say they received several calls about the man, which prompted an hour-long search over the weekend. (visit the link
for the full news article)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 02:50 PM by burdman30ott6
|
Aside from making me laugh out loud, this article made me wonder why he was charged with disorderly conduct. Trespassing I can understand as
pedestrians aren't allowed inside interstate rights-of-way unless they have had car troubles by federal law. However, unless he was nude, how is
wearing a pair of fake breasts and a thong disorderly conduct?
www.philly.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 02:54 PM by Mad_Hatter
|
reply to post by burdman30ott6
Well I don't know about you, but I call wearing nothing but a thong in public rather lewd. I know he's technically not naked, but come on. If
there was a woman walking down the street bear breasted with a thong on, I'm sure it would have went the same way. It's not like he was at the
beach. Would you want your kids seeing that? I wouldn't. This did make me laugh also.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 02:54 PM by EverythingYouDespise
|
It sounds like he was trying to prostitute himself but they didn't have any evidence to get him on that so they got him on the trespass technicality
and tacked on the disorderly conduct to make the punishment more severe.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 02:59 PM by burdman30ott6
|
reply to post by Mad_Hatter
No, I wouldn't want my kids to see that at all. However, I'm still not sure it's a crime in this country. Seattle's got a naked parade/bike
event where you have fully naked people with a little body paint on wandering around the streets. I know they aren't the only city that has
something like this. They've challenged it in court and the courts have ruled they have a right to do this as long as it doesn't cross over into
the pornographic. I guess maybe this is an example of might makes right and since this was one dude having his own little parade he hasn't got the
same rights as the groups of people do.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 03:07 PM by Mad_Hatter
|
reply to post by burdman30ott6
Wow, I didn't even know that. The more you know, I guess.
My guess is maybe it has to do with all the calls they received on him. For instance, in my part of town one can't go to the gas station without
being harassed by a bum for money, cigarettes or something. If the police get enough calls on them, they will come arrest them. I've seen it
happen, even if the homeless person isn't in possession of any illegal contraban. I'd say this is pretty similar. Kind of equal to disturbing the
peace or something of that nature.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 03:26 PM by Grafilthy
|
reply to post by burdman30ott6
Seattle's got a naked parade/bike event where you have fully naked people with a little body paint on wandering around the streets.

If you looked like THIS.....and you lived in Seattle....
....you would walk around naked all the time!
Seriously though, probably was a distraction for drivers.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 04:39 PM by d11_m_na_c05
|
Welcome to the first day of kindergarten remember kids . If you dont look at the person next to you you wont know there making silly faces..
Seriously tho . This is so stupid i hope he sues .
What happened to freedom of expression ? Now i could see if he had his wang-chung hanging out . Or even a fake one that led enough people to believe
it was.
But this ? Man they must have 0 crime there . 0 rape 0 murder.
I would sue everyone involved. and there grand parents . Then i would show up to court . With the best lawyer money can buy in nothing but a wig and
thong and possibly a judges robe .
If he can wear one so can i
Anyway . This is yet another case of . If you were not looking you wouldn't know how silly they look.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 04:45 PM by ZindoDoone
|
Its not stupid, if you knew how he almost caused a few Wrecks on the hiway and flashed a few folks besides. He was a menace and a hazard by wandering
into the lanes of the hiway when he was in his 'costume'. He's also a known nutcase. Thats not his fault but still, it doesn't excuse his
behavior.
Zindo
[edit on 7/1/2008 by ZindoDoone]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 04:51 PM by PeaceUk
|
Cool. I hope I see this here in London one day. That would be fun.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 04:54 PM by d11_m_na_c05
|
reply to post by ZindoDoone
So he was running out into the road ? Hmmm . .. Was he throwing stuff at cars?
No hmm...
I cant wait till i see a real ugly person . Im gonna call the cops and tell them they were so ugly they almost made me crash my car.
What about an interracial couple kissing .
That could make some people sick and maybe almost crash there cars .. What about a hot lesbian couple making out . Or a gay couple . Could bother
people or possible make them crash there cars...
This is a case of people making there issues other people issues .
IF YOU WERE NOT LOOKING YOU WOULDN'T KNOW
 Its not stupid, if you knew how he almost caused a few Wrecks on the hiway and flashed a few folks besides. He was a menace and a hazard by
wandering into the lanes of the hiway when he was in his 'costume'. He's also a known nutcase. Thats not his fault but still, it doesn't excuse
his behavior. 
Where did you get ANY of this info ? Its not in any article i can find . They didn't even find him in the road . He was picking up cans and was not
even in this "costume"
Are you just making tripe up?
[edit on 1-7-2008 by d11_m_na_c05]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:01 PM by dunwichwitch
|
Originally posted by Mad_Hatter
reply to post by burdman30ott6
Well I don't know about you, but I call wearing nothing but a thong in public rather lewd. I know he's technically not naked, but come on. If
there was a woman walking down the street bear breasted with a thong on, I'm sure it would have went the same way. It's not like he was at the
beach. Would you want your kids seeing that? I wouldn't. This did make me laugh also.

Kids are gunna see boobs and undergarments and penises and bare bodies anyway. Who cares? They can deal with it.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:07 PM by d11_m_na_c05
|
OMG we must ban the circus . All magazines ALL clowns . ALL porn ALL funny dress/garb.
All street performers . All gays . Lesbians blacks whites . Heck i'm sure there's someone offended by kittens (allergic?) BAN THEM .
Heck you almost made my computer crash BANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
image source: http://blogs.kansascity.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/03/27/thong.jpg
[edit on 1-7-2008 by d11_m_na_c05]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:19 PM by BlackOps719
|
reply to post by d11_m_na_c05
If that aint illegal it should be
Man thongs are no joke
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:32 PM by whaaa
|
Having kids see a yahoo in a thong and fake boobs.....
Oh the horror.....
On the www. they can see decapitations, mutilations, torture, real sick porno and George Bush and you're worried about a geek dressed silly.
Everyweekend I play in a bar where usually women that are usually 50 lbs overweight flash their breast, and more and everyone loves it. Christ, I'd
rather hang with saloon society than a bunch of uptight prudes.
please..................
[edit on 1-7-2008 by whaaa]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:33 PM by burdman30ott6
|
reply to post by d11_m_na_c05
Seriously man, did you have to break out the banana hammock picture? That was just wrong and uncalled for. I'm calling the Conneticutt cops on you
ASAP.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:36 PM by d11_m_na_c05
|
reply to post by burdman30ott6
Ahh crap i hope they wont commute to Michigan to get me . lol . . Sorry if any children seen . I just happen to have a spare thong laying about an had
to snap a quick photo for this one (joke not me lol random "thong" image)
[edit on 1-7-2008 by d11_m_na_c05]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 05:41 PM by BlackOps719
|
Looks kinda like Mr. Belding from Saved By The Bell.
Thanks for giving me that mental image to carry around for the next day or so.
Nasty.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 06:52 PM by LordInfamous
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 1-7-2008 @ 08:13 PM by MrMysticism
|
Originally posted by Mad_Hatter
Well I don't know about you, but I call wearing nothing but a thong in public rather lewd. 
That made me laugh! By the way that would be indecent exposure not a lewd act. A lewd act is him doing something in front of someone. My guess is
this is not the full story!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |