It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Subsection 1B. In any case where the age is not immediately apparent, it is to be assumed the depiction is under the age of 18 years until proof shows otherwise.
which person shall not be fully clothed and engaged in ordinary activities normally done in public.
See now here is where we run into problems with trying to regulate such a ban.
Subsection 1B. In any case where the age is not immediately apparent, it is to be assumed the depiction is under the age of 18 years until proof shows otherwise.
How can anyone prove a drawing is over the age of 18?
My position is that child pornography and the pedophiles who propogate it should be told of how society has such a subversive effect on people, and that they shouldn't blame themselves for being susceptible to it.
But you asked me about my original approach, and my original action for that was one which is secondary to the action i highlighted in this post.
Originally posted by harvib
I don't understand the point you are trying to make with that statement.
A) Protect All Children, Regardless Of Family Privacy.
B) Remove all traces of a perverted nature, while at the same time offering a general amnesty to pedophiles if they come forwards for treatment.
Originally posted by harvib
Or maybe you are saying it should be up to the community to take matters into their own hands?
Originally posted by CRDDD
@Aeon937s- Pedophiles CANNOT be helped. No matter how much therapy they have, they will still have a lust for children. Once someone is a pedo, they're always a pedo.
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
Originally posted by sparda4355
in order to take away this right you must crush the very foundation of the bill of rights that make America the great country that it is!!!*
Fact: drawings are not people
Fact: drawings don't have rights
Fact: drawings don't have feelings
Fact: drawings are drawings!
Fact: you can't prove that a drawing is under the age of 18, only that based on our opinion the drawing appears to be under the age of 18! You can't even prove that the drawing is that of a human and not an imagionary species created in the mind of the artist!
*You damn sheep.
It's all well and noble for you to look at it that way, but don't ever forget that the people taking advantage of that 'foundation' are well aware of the fact that people like you are protecting their interests.
As for your facts, well done for pointing out a few things that people already know about.
Originally posted by Anti-Tyrant
Originally posted by sparda4355
in order to take away this right you must crush the very foundation of the bill of rights that make America the great country that it is!!!*
Fact: drawings are not people
Fact: drawings don't have rights
Fact: drawings don't have feelings
Fact: drawings are drawings!
Fact: you can't prove that a drawing is under the age of 18, only that based on our opinion the drawing appears to be under the age of 18! You can't even prove that the drawing is that of a human and not an imagionary species created in the mind of the artist!
*You damn sheep.
It's all well and noble for you to look at it that way, but don't ever forget that the people taking advantage of that 'foundation' are well aware of the fact that people like you are protecting their interests.
As for your facts, well done for pointing out a few things that people already know about.