reply to post by lucid eyes
Because up untill now the world bankers have always infiltrated communism and used it for redistribution of wealth in their favour?
The problem is not redistribution as a principle, which can have positive aplication if everyone does their homework and is above board, the problem
is with execution and a world economic atmosphere shrouded in secrecy, deception and downright lies.
Capping wealth to say a billion at the individual or even family level would hurt nobody and would be beneficial for society as a whole, as it would
allow more democratic processes. This could be done with a redistribution component if the people so decided at the group mind level. Redistribution
can leave the rich, well, rich, as the sheer size of today's concentrated fortunes is mind boggling.
It is impossible for one person to even hold let's say 10 trillion in assets, as the sheer physical disparity is too great. These people are
powerbrokers, as their physical wealth is not used for direct personal gratification but for other more megalomaniacal and even sociopathic goals.
People have been conditioned in the west against redistribution, but the reality of democratic redistribution of wealth is it would almost unfailably
work in their great favour. Remember that less than 1% of the population of the world is reported to own 80% of the wealth, which is a totally
unsatisfactory way to organise human society.
Been a while since I posted in this thread, sorry if I repeat myself.
[edit on 24-9-2008 by Zepherian]
[edit on 24-9-2008 by Zepherian]

