Originally posted by Shoktek

Originally posted by Seekerof
An indictment is issued based on evidence(s).

"An indictment is issued by a grand jury, which determines from evidence presented by a prosecutor that a crime was committed and the suspect should stand trial on the allegations."
www.superiorcourt.maricopa.gov...

Yes, and the jury determines whether or not the accused is guilty...it seems you have forgotten, innocent until proven guilty. Simply indicting someone doesn't mean they are guilty of the crime..this "evidence" will have to convince the jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he is in fact guilty...



Shoktek
Oh, no my misguided shadow....no, no....I have forgotten nothing....nada, not a dern thing. As such, the topic is "evidences"....and as with those "evidences", you seriously need to absorb and read the above again. What you have failed to understand or comprehend, as others have, is that an indictment is given based on "evidences"!
Yep, I will agree that the "man" or individual is "innocent", but let me assure you, an indictment is not served nor given unless there is sufficient "evidences" to support or constitute a conviction.....based on said "evidences".

Now you and others can roll it and smoke it how you like...but, with pun intended, the "evidences" speak for themselves.

The topic was "evidences"...sadly, for you and others, there seems to be sufficient "evidences"!
The US has had an indictment on Bin Laden since 1998, Mr. Clinton's time period, for committing acts of terrorism overseas on US facilites. Bin Laden has another on him for 9/11. Spain has one on Bin Laden, as mentioned above. If there was no "evidences" against Mr. Bin Laden, why was the Taliban issuing warnigs to the US over this?
"Taliban Cautions U.S. Regarding bin Ladin Indictment"
www.ict.org.il...

Some very interesting information here also, in regards to "evidences":
"The War on Terrorism: Osama bin Laden and al-Qa'ida"
www.lib.ecu.edu...

The UN has resolutions on and against Bin Laden based on "evidences".
The UK has proceedings and "evidences" of 9/11 and Mr. Bin Laden.
Again...."evidences" seem to be everywhere....even posted on the internet in a wide variety of word combinations....but again, as with anything, the people who defend such madness, cry "evidences"....


regards
seekerof

Originally posted by silQ
Well other than those video tapes and audio tapes of osama saying that he was responsible for the attacks, we have absolutely no evidence....duhhhhhhhh.........

Howq do you know it was him?!?! Do you speak arabic!?!? I don't think so... Just go ahead and believe whatever you goverment tells you like a good old patroit

Originally posted by silQ
and i seriously doubt that those were made somewhere in the U.S since they were all aired on arab t.v's first and the reporters obtained them through members of the al Qaeda network

Once again how do you know this?!?! You don't understand that both sides are guilty. This is a big chess game to them. They could care less how many people die. This is a form of population control to them

Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
The last time an event prompted these kinds of questions was 11-22-63. We had the man who acted alone, who planned and executed the horror in Dallas. And he didn't do it.

Yes that is my point exactly. Open your eyes people. The occult organizations are leading us like sheep into nuclear Armageddon. I didn’t know that the Kennedy happened in November. What’s the deal with all the 11’s

Originally posted by Seekerof
Some very interesting information here also, in regards to "evidences":
"The War on Terrorism: Osama bin Laden and al-Qa'ida"
www.lib.ecu.edu...

The Taliban sets deadline for evidence against bin Ladin
The most the Taliban is willing to do is try bin Ladin under Islamic law in Afghanistan if provided with evidence of his involvement in terrorist activities. Several weeks ago a judicial inquiry was set up by the militia to investigate the allegations against him. According to Taliban spokesman Abdul Hai Muttmayan, "If anyone has any evidence of bin Ladin's involvement in cases of terrorism, subversion, sabotage or any other acts they should present it to the court before November 20. If by then there is nothing, we will close the case and in our eyes he will be acquitted."

The United States has dismissed the Taliban's ultimatum. "We believe that Osama bin Ladin should be brought to justice swiftly for his crimes," U.S. State Department spokesman James Rubin said, adding, "there is no expiration date on terrorist acts of this kind." Rubin said that the United States is discussing the bin Ladin issue with the Taliban. However, he ruled out the possibility of a formal extradition request, because the U.S. does not recognize the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan.