It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Grambler
But the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory seismograph clearly shows the spikes, (link on my previous post). Also the first graph posted on your post show them.
As to Steve Davis's credibility, he has a PhD from Stanford in Geology, has several peer reviewed articles, and is a member of the Geological Society of America.
Your expert see no spike or blip whatsoever, mine claims they are consistent with an detonation. We can see the graph my expert used, if only there was some way of seeing the evidence Blanchard used, oh thats right he won't release it.
The government REFUSES to give their evidence. How can you blindly believe them?
Originally posted by Alethia
reply to post by Soloist
Should the planes not be factored in? Can they not be considered the first explosive device that took out floors, allowing the following "squibs" to finish the job?
Originally posted by Doc Velocity
Hearsay is not "proof"... Which is why so much (if not all) of the 911 conspiracy theory is sensational fabrication that wouldn't last 5 seconds as evidence in a court of law.
Oh! Oh! I saw something on YouTube about somebody claiming they heard something, somewhere! It must be true!!
Originally posted by Doc Velocity
no "gubbermint cubberup"...
Originally posted by Alethia
Wow, I never knew what a moron was until now. I guess the only way you'll believe that WTC 1, 2 & 7 were demolished with explosives is when you see a picture of a guy in a hard hat with a big explosives plunger standing next to them huh?
Do you understand the element of disguise? They didn't have to take it down right after impact, in fact if they did it would look even more suspicious, 2 towers falling instantly when a jet crashes into them, even though both were designed to take the impact of a jet plane? Wow, I smell a lawsuit right there.
The process however is the same. Middle floors taken out (we have video footage of planes taking out the middle floors in WTC 1 & 2), foundations taken out (witnesses claim explosions taking place in the basement area of the WTC), squibs taking out the remaining floors to help the building collapse in it's own footprint (video evidence shows the possible use of explosives taking place on lower floors as the top of both WTC 1 & 2 begin to collapse).
So the process matches, the only reason it happens instantly in a controlled demolition is because they're not trying to cover up the fact they're bringing the buildings down.
Originally posted by Grambler
reply to post by Soloist
So you don't trust the testimony of the dozens of witnesses who all independently claim there was an explosion in the basement? Or the fact that people were little blown off their feet by explosions? Or the seismographic evidence the we've been discussing? And again to a point everyone refuses to answer, why doesn't the government just release the evidence and clear their names if they've nothing to hide?
Originally posted by Grambler
I would like to see some of this video they took in the basement, I never heard of it.
How could a plane hitting the top of the building cause an explosions in the basement.
Witness accounts don't report seeing a raging inferno in the basement, only hearing explosions in the basement, that they were sure were bombs.
Not to beat a dead horse, but again: if the government would release the evidence the debate would end. What possible reason do they have for not releasing it?
Originally posted by Soloist
Saying it sounded like a bomb would be correct, assuming it actually was a bomb, well, is just wrong.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by Soloist
Saying it sounded like a bomb would be correct, assuming it actually was a bomb, well, is just wrong.
Then the "federal agencies" in the video who are investigating "suspicious devices" and who claim that a secondary "truck bomb" exploded in the WTC towers, not to mention the FDNY firefighters who are warning bystanders of a "BOMB" in the building are well, just wrong.
But I'm sure you know more than they do.
Originally posted by Soloist
So you're telling me you are taking the word of those you distrust?
Originally posted by Soloist
Regardless, this is missing the point, the towers fell from the top down. No bomb in the basement brought them down.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
According to you. Not according to the dozens of "federal agency" employees, police, firefighters, paramedics, TV anchors, reporters, WTC employees and eyewitnesses who were actually at the scene.