It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LordBaskettIV
Why punish these fools when our own constitution allows us to kill them? That may set the rest of the ones who we don't shoot, into straighting up thier act. Think od the tax money it would waste to prosicute any of these fools. 20$ of bullets should do nicely.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
reply to post by burdman30ott6
I do agree with you that congress has shirked their responsibility. However, I would like to point out, "the decider" and his cabinet were responsible for presenting a case for war with Iraq to congress and the american public.
In other words just like Charlie Manson was responsible for the Tate LaBianca murders George is "responsible" for the Iraq war. The Decider convinced congress that our nation was threatened by Iraq. He lied and that is why he should be tried for war crimes.
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
For those here who believe a prosecution of a former president unlikely, or impossible even
Originally posted by RRconservative
Under Buglliosi warped view, every President from George Washington to George Bush could be brought up on murder charges.
Bush Derangement Syndrome rears its ugly head again.