Britain releases batch of files on UFO sightings, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 02:20 PM by Gregandgemma
reply to post by thesaint



The Saint.............I have to agree. They ripped it out of Robbie and then this morning were shocking.

Why is anything like this ridiculed in the UK? I raised the issue at work and immediately wished I hadn't as the sheeple were very dismissive and grouped up and tried to ridicule me.

Lets just wait and see what the future brings!

[edit on 14-5-2008 by Gregandgemma]

[edit on 14-5-2008 by Gregandgemma]


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 02:40 PM by jasonjnelson
reply to post by thesaint



So does that make the point of sharing this, to be not one of disclosure, but ridicule? We cannot force everyone to believe, but why make it easier for others to be skeptical? I think now, after sleeping on it, that this m ay not have been a "good" release. Though I have yet to finish DL them all. I REALLY want some help, please, comparing these to other official releases, and figure out if there have been any "world flybys" ... You know what I mean?


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 03:35 PM by jasonjnelson
reply to post by yogifootballer



I have seen some of these so far. It is a huge pain to download all these. So how many are still unreleased?


reply posted on 14-5-2008 @ 11:11 PM by Aldolas
reply to post by thesaint


First of all: Every time someone takes Chrs Moyles' seriously (on the texts) he always says the same thing: "I'm only here to entertain you! If you want something with depth go somewhere else! I'm only here to put a smile on your face!" That is way he takes the p out of everything and everybody. Sadly I missed that part of the show, anybody know WHEN he said it? I might listen again...
Secondly, BTW Terry Wogan (Radio 2) has 4 Mill. more listeners, anybody know what he said about it?

@ Topic: I don't think it's a 'conspiracy' (the way newsreaders and entertainers are laughing about UFO's): They have (most likely) been hearing that it's nonsense for their whole lives, so, of course, they are (sadly) goining to take the p out of aliens/ufo's etc.
It doesn't make it right, but isn't disclosure spreading 'the word'?
How many people were watching/listening to the news yesterday and started looking the subject up??


@ argueing about these subjects at work: DON'T!
It's not worth it, if you want to speak about it, then just ASK, what THEY think about it, if you've got a 'truthseeker' you'll find out, save's the hassle of being a nutter!! ^^
. o O (Everybody hates missionaries and if they aren't 'ready' you haven't got a chance anyway)


Have a good day and don't let the rain wash the smile off your face,
Sam the Nutter

[size=-1]p.s. live on boat, believe in 'all this cr*p: veah, Nutter ^^ [/size]


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 04:34 PM by djerwulfe
Originally posted by TrentReznor
yeah heard about it on the radio...and on our local tv news program "northwest tonight" they noted uk's most famuse case..at "Rendelsham" so maybe new light may be shed on that one.


Yes, Rendelsham Forest incident Dec. 1980, near anglomerican military base called Woodbridge, UK.
Cited as potentially an elaborate military experiment/drill, but if not it was a meeting of officers and ETs.

So I have a yardstick/ruler by which I'm watching Disclosure-type progress. It's historically based, but if the "acceleration of progress" (maybe a cultural application of Moore's Law?) is at all true I will have a conservative estimate for a time frame for an actual full diclosure.
My Rule involves the Copernican model of the solar system and the Catholic Church/Vatican.

The Copernican model was published in 1539 overthrowing the previous Ptolemic model of an earth-based solar system. I believe the Ptolemic model was accepted by the Church at the time.
(from The Science Book, Cassell & Co., UK, 2001.)

It wasn't until 1835 that the Catholic Church officially endorsed the Copernican solar system, i.e. it wasn't until then that Catholics were allowed to believe in a Sun-centered solar system.
(from Wikipedia, 5/10/08)

That's my rule of analogous population-institutional belief progress at the turn of the last millenium.

So there's a model, now where are the analogies?

Well, as much as I hate to say it, (this hurts...) Roswell, NM may be our analogous 1539 publication.

If it's aperfect fit without we can expect full disclosure by 2243 AD...
BUT, the Vatican just said it was OK to believe in ETs.

Why would they do that? They aren't in the habit of endorsing disruptive arguably heretical ideas ... unless they are confronted with incontrovertible proof and they don't want to look like fools....?


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 09:55 PM by jasonjnelson
reply to post by RedGolem



What is the rundown on this conspiracy? I failed to find that link, and would love it if you could direct me....
I hate that my french is so rusty, as it is taking forever for me to be able to make the connections I want with the UK sightings. Of course, I think we are getting bottom barrel stuff here...

[edit on 15-5-2008 by jasonjnelson]


reply posted on 15-5-2008 @ 10:09 PM by RedGolem
Here is the link to the UK page.
The quote I typed in above does not really refer to one conspiracy in particular. It was a statement made by a UK official in regards to UFO Cover Ups by the CIA. So I take that as conformation by a foreign government that there are UFO cover ups happening. And as the reference stated, initiated by the CIA.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags