It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by Conspiracy Realist
Yea. Cloud produced by explosives planted towards the center of the building only injecting out single windows at random levels.
Right.......
*please note sarcasm*
And didn't you notice that the collapses favored or certain side.
The sides that were initially struck.
[edit on 13-5-2008 by WraothAscendant]
Originally posted by RomanMaroni
So we have buildings that look as if explosives were used to bring them down. Whether you believe that or not, you must admit, it looks as if the buildings "exploded." The first tower that collapses appears to tilt as if to fall over. Then somehow the tower underneath the tilting part simultaneously begins to fall, despite obviously applying less pressure opposite the direction of the tilt. Then that whole section above seems to just disappear behind a cloud of dust.
If you believe all this was just normal, then how would you explain the Israeli's who were arrested by the George Washington Bridge with a van full of explosives? As described by Dan Rather in this video: video.google.com...
Why do you suppose they had explosives in the van? And other Israeli's were arrested due to reports of filming and celebrating the attack. I wonder what they were intending to do with those explosives. I also wonder why the company they worked for closed up shop and move out of the US within days. We have people making accusations that explosives were used. We have people arrested in possession of explosives. Would this qualify as a 2 + 2 = 4 equation?
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
reply to post by Conspiracy Realist
Yea. Cloud produced by explosives planted towards the center of the building only injecting out single windows at random levels.
Right.......
*please note sarcasm*
And didn't you notice that the collapses favored or certain side.
The sides that were initially struck.
[edit on 13-5-2008 by WraothAscendant]
Originally posted by Conspiracy Realist
You and your government wants us to believe the laws of physics were some how suspended on 9/11 to allow two 110 story steel structures to collapse in 8-10 seconds.
What force would be needed to hurl steel weighing in the tons laterally upto 500 feet away... ummm explosives....
Originally posted by jfj123
It's amazing how when the truthers get upset like you have, suddenly start hurling childish insults.
You make claims of impossibilities yet I can show you experts in demolition, engineering, physics who say you're wrong.
Originally posted by WraothAscendant
They can't win you by their faulty "facts" they will try to insult you into agreeing with them.
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
2- If you're suggesting that explosives were used to blast these heavy pieces, I suggest that you first find some calculations about how much RDX would be needed to throw a 30 ton piece 500'. You'd no longer push this ridiculous theory if you actually knew.
Originally posted by ANOK
Why don't you do some calculations to show it wouldn't need explosives to laterally eject 500 ton pieces of steel.
Originally posted by Seymour Butz
Still believe that explosives did it?
Originally posted by _Del_
You've never snapped a twig and seen a piece be ejected laterally? It's tension provided by gravity, not gravity pulling it sideways.