It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Synthetic fuel
A gaseous, liquid, or solid fuel that does not occur naturally; also known as synfuel. Synthetic fuels can be made from coal, oil shale, or tar sands. Included in the category are various fuel gases, such as substitute natural gas and synthesis gas.
Syncrude is a synthetic crude oil, a complex mixture of hydrocarbons somewhat similar to petroleum. It is obtained from coal (liquefaction), from synthesis gas (a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen), or from oil shale and tar sands. Syncrudes generally differ in composition from petroleum; for example, syncrude from coal usually contains more aromatic hydrocarbons than petroleum. Gaseous fuels can be produced from sources other than petroleum and natural gas.
The most important source of synthetic crude oil is the tar sand deposit that occurs in northeastern Alberta, Canada. Tar sand is a common term for oil-impregnated sediments that can be found in almost every continent. The routes by which synthetic fuels can be prepared from coal involve either gasification or liquefaction.
Gasification can yield clean gases for combustion or synthesis gas, which has a controlled ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide. Catalytic conversion of synthesis gas to liquids (indirect liquefaction) can be carried out in fixed- and fluidized-bed reactors and in dilute-phase systems. Another method for producing synthetic fuels from coal involves gasification of the coal to a fuel gas that may be used as such or as a source of synthetic liquids. See also Coal gasification; Fluidization.
Coal liquefaction is accomplished by four principal methods: direct catalytic hydrogenation, solvent extraction, pyrolysis, and indirect catalytic hydrogenation (of carbon monoxide). See also Coal liquefaction; Hydrogenation; Pyrolysis; Solvent extraction.
Shale oil is readily produced by the thermal processing of oil shales. The basic technology is available, and commercial plants are operated in many parts of the world.
Wikipedia: synthetic fuel
Synthetic fuel or synfuel is any liquid fuel obtained from coal, natural gas, or biomass. It can sometimes refer to fuels derived from other solids such as oil shale, tar sand, waste plastics, or from the fermentation of biomatter. It can also (less often) refer to gaseous fuels produced in a similar way.
Processes
The process of producing synfuels is often referred to as Coal-To-Liquids (CTL), Gas-To-Liquids (GTL) or Biomass-To-Liquids (BTL), depending on the initial feedstock. Synthetic crude may also be created by upgrading bitumen (a tar like substance found in tar sands), or synthesizing liquid hydrocarbons from oil shale and synthesis gas, a mixture of carbon monoxide and methane.
The best known synthesis process is the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis which was used on a large scale in Germany during World War II. Other processes include the Bergius process, the Mobil process and the Karrick process. An intermediate step in the production of synthetic fuel is often syngas, a stoichiometric mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, which is sometimes directly used as an industrial fuel.
Commercialization
Sasol
The leading company in the commercialization of synthetic fuel is Sasol, a company based in South Africa. Sasol currently operates the world's only commercial coal-to-liquids facility at Secunda, with a capacity of 150,000 barrels a day [1]. Other companies that have developed coal- or gas-to-liquids processes (at the pilot plant or commercial stage) include Shell, Exxon, Statoil, Rentech, and Syntroleum [2]. Worldwide commercial gas-to-liquids plant capacity is 60,000 barrels per day [3], including plants in South Africa (Mossgas), Malaysia (Shell Bintulu) and New Zealand (Motor-fuel production at the New Zealand Synfuel site has been shut down since the mid nineties, although production of methanol for export continues [4]. This site ran on the Mobil process converting gas to methanol and methanol to gasoline).
Commercialization in the United States
Numerous US companies (TECO, Progress Energy, DTE, Marriott) have also taken advantage of coal-based synfuel tax credits established in the 1970s, however many of the products qualifying for the subsidy (for example slurries or briquettes) are not true synthetic fuels since they are not the portable, convenient, end-user liquids that the credit was established for.[neutrality disputed] The coal industry currently uses the credit to increase profits on coal-burning powerplants by introducing a "pre-treatment" process that satisfies the technical requirements, then burns the result the same as it would burn coal. Sometimes the amount gained in the tax credit is a major factor in the economic operation of the plant. The synfuel tax credit has been used primarily in this manner since the cheap gas prices of the 1980's killed any major efforts to create a transportation fuel with the credit, and its continuation is seen as a major "pork project" win for coal industry lobbyists, to the tune of $9 billion per annum.[neutrality disputed][1]The total production of such synfuels in the US was an estimated 73 million tons in 2002.
The United States Department of Energy projects that domestic consumption of synthetic fuel made from coal and natural gas will rise to 3.7 million barrels per day in 2030 based on a price of $57 per barrel of high sulfur crude (Annual Energy Outlook 2006, Table 14, pg52).
Economics
Synthetic fuels require a relatively high price of crude oil in order to be competitive with petroleum-based fuels without subsidies.[dubious – discuss] However, they offer the potential to supplement or replace petroleum-based fuels if oil prices continue to rise. Several factors make synthetic fuels attractive relative to competing technologies such as biofuels, ethanol/methanol or hydrogen:
* The raw material (coal) is available in quantities sufficient to meet current demand for centuries
* It can produce gasoline, diesel or kerosene directly without the need for additional steps such as reforming or cracking
* There is no need to convert vehicle engines to use a different fuel
* There is no need to build a new distribution network
Environmental aspects
Liquified coal emits twice as much carbon dixoide as burning oil, so carbon sequestration is proposed to prevent an adverse impact on greenhouse gas emissions.[2]
Originally posted by BlueTriangle
We should be thankful that investors are still interested or we'd have no gas.
Petro-Canada, the worst performer among Canada's largest oil companies, said first-quarter profit rose 82% on higher oil prices and production.
Net income climbed to $1.08-billion, or $2.20 a share, from $590-million, or $1.18, a year earlier, the Calgary-based company said today in a statement published on its Web site. Revenue rose 36% to $6.62-billion.
Source
Originally posted by GAOTU789
Petro-Canada, the worst performer among Canada's largest oil companies, said first-quarter profit rose 82% on higher oil prices and production.
Originally posted by jackinthebox
reply to post by Sublime620
Don't get me wrong, oil companies suck, literally. They're vampires to our wallets, and to the Earth itself. But there is a much bigger problem that most people are unaware of. The oil companies are like a front. They're there to take the heat.