Originally posted by Bigwhammy
That's quite a leap since it specifically says Divorce. I know this might be a stretch for your way of thinking... maybe when it says divorce,
it means divorce?
i meant the subtext, not translation. my bad. seriously, it's the same argument...
Nearly two-thirds of today's marriages will end in divorce or separation. Forty-five percent of all first marriages end in divorce.
and that leads to the degradation of society how?
how about this: we stop telling kids that marriage is the only way people can have sex. then we can say that marriage is reserved for those people
that want to spend their lives together
odd note: gays hold marriage quite sacredly, don't they? 1 divorce case with all the gay marriages (so far). and they're fighting very hard for the
right to get married. maybe you have an unlikely ally there.
Irrelevant erroneous comment. That's not what the traditional meaning of the marriage ceremony is. It goes all the way back to Abraham's first
covenant with God in Genesis. It's talking about a lifetime bond.
marriage predates that. marriage was a sumerian custom well before abram (later abraham) left ur.
it was not at all an irrelevant erroneous comment and your response was nothing but an ignorant view of the history of marriage.
Maybe you need to look in a different chapter of that biology book you use to read about evolution. Man and Woman not "samey samey". Women can have
babies and men can not....
yes, but in terms of rights and privileges, they are the same. men and women are equal, the only difference are, as you said, superficial biological
ones.
women deserve the exact same rights, thus the importance of feminism to shrug off the yoke of sexism
Your comment is on a completely different topic. Dr Zimmerman is talking about the basic laws of society.
which ones?
i mean, "the basic laws of society" are actually quite arbitrary products of the zeitgeist and subject to change.
From the OP "violent crime has also increased 560% since 1960"
and it's been going down since the nineties...
and what does this have to do with marriage and "traditional values"?
it seems like more evidence that "traditional values" have utterly failed us and that we need more enlightened values that rely on compassion and
empathy instead of on archaic foundations
From the OP "since 1960 and illegitimate births were up 419% by 1990. In 2005 36.9 % of all births were to unmarried women."
how does this deal with promiscuity? promiscuity is the number of partners you have sex with, not whether or not your child is born in or out of
wedlock
That statement explicitly addresses "people with traditional marriages". It does not define a nontraditional marriage.
it implies there's a difference.
What it refers to is the fact that a lot of children are no longer raised by there parents. And dead beat Dads that do not provide for them. It says
what it says.
and people have done great things without being raised in traditional households. there's nothing to show that a traditional household is inherently
better than a nontraditional one.
Obviously there is or the divorce rates wouldn't be so high. What people do is more indicative, than what they say sometimes...
ah, but you're indicating that divorce = adultery
do you call the woman who divorces her abusive husband who routinely batters her an adulteress when she marries?
alright, i'm snipping a lot. i just want to know where the causation is.
Hardly ! Maybe you missed that the author of the study was noted Harvard Sociologist and Historian Dr. Carle Zimmerman. His book, "Family and
Civilization," is a scholarly work, pure history, sociology, and science. Far from being current rhetoric from the "religious right," the book was
published in 1947.
ah, then it's early religious right. the religious right was well established by the late 40s...
remember prohibition? one big group behind it was the religious right.
Good points which were mentioned, more symptoms of the breakdown of the family.
...there's no causation
at all