Building a Case for Attack on Iran’s Nuclear Sites
Amid renewed speculation after President Bush’s Knesset speech last week that he may yet order an attack on Iran before he leaves office, particularly if Sen. Obama should win the November elections, it appears that the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) is preparing the case for why an attack — either by the U.S. or Israel — on Tehran’s nuclear facilities might not be as calamitous as most analysts, including top Pentagon brass, believe. WINEP, of course, was founded by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and has acted as an integral part of the so-called Israel Lobby since its launch.
Go figure... WINEP founded by AIPAC
Israel mulling Iran strike
In the light of a Dec 3 US National Intelligence Estimate, which conceded with 'high confidence' that Iran is not conducting nuclear weapons programs, Tel Aviv accuses Tehran of pursuing nuclear arms to 'wipe Israel off the map'.
Iran, however, maintains its nuclear drive is solely aimed at producing electricity for a growing population. The Islamic Republic also stresses that it has never initiated a war against any country.
The Olmert regime is widely believed to have been demanding President George W. Bush, who just recently offered one of the strongest demonstrations of support for Israel ever made by an American president, to counter 'the Iranian threat' by striking the country's nuclear sites.
Israel 'would consider strike' amid fears over Iran's weapons programme
AS ISRAEL pursues peace talks with Syria, speculation is growing that the Jewish state will seriously consider unilateral military action against Iran within the next year.
"Within a year, the Israeli government will have to decide between two options: either not do anything and reconcile itself to the fact that Iran is now nuclear, or take unilateral military action," Giora Eiland, Israel's former national security adviser, told Scotland on Sunday.
"There is no guarantee that Hezbollah will react automatically. Hezbollah are very aware of Israel's strength, and of the harsh reaction that may result if they attack."
Syria rejects linking Israel peace with cutting off Iran
Syria will not accept preconditions over its resumed peace talks with Israel and will not compromise its relations with other states, the government daily Tishrin said on Saturday, referring to Iran.
"Damascus rejects all preconditions concerning its relations with other countries and peoples," it said after an Israeli call for Damascus to distance itself from Tehran, which has called for the destruction of the Jewish state.
Last June, Syria's ruling coalition, the National Progressive Front, accused Israel of trying to "impose conditions which have nothing to do with the principles of peace."
Israel also wants Syria to stop supporting Lebanese and Palestinian militant groups. Damascus has repeatedly denied having links to such organisations.
Tishrin said on Saturday that adding non-negotiable conditions to the indirect talks would hamstring efforts to achieve peace.
"Syria is not concerned with Israeli (policy) but with peace and achieving it by the shortest route," the editorial said.
Damascus says it has received Israeli commitments for a full withdrawal from the occupied-Golan Heights, the main sticking point in previous talks.
What? Syria has the gall to say they won't have Israels' "preconditions" to resume peace talks? [/sarcasm] Again, how do Israel or the US ever expect others to seriously talk 'peace' when one is ALWAYS trying to demand prior stipulations for talks to occur. Ridiculous. Good to see Syria pointing this out.
China, Russia rule out military actions on Iran
China and Russia on Friday called on all parties to refrain from military and extreme actions against Iran.
"All parties should consider global and regional security, make diplomatic efforts, refrain from military and extreme means, cautiously resort to sanctions and take into account the interests of the country involved," the statement said.
Most people don't consider these two countries in relation to this Mid-East mess... and our Admin. doesn't think about anyone elses' interests when continuing to look over there, toward Iran, thru their 'blinders.' This is going to turn into a 'World-wide mess' if they continue to make poor decisions. And World-wide mess = WWIII... and a whole lot of destruction and misery for everyone (except the elite pulling the strings, of course).


