When a Great Power Goes Mad, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 02:42 PM by mrmonsoon
reply to post by ergoli



come on now.

You are actually trying to use al-jahad as a news source.

PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

They actually make Cnn and Fox news seem fully honest and reliable in comparison.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 02:58 PM by jackinthebox
reply to post by mrmonsoon



You are actually trying to use al-jahad as a news source.


You must have missed the rest of the thread.

================================================


I don't know much about the author one way or the other. I don't like the idea that the author set up "forestlady"s Dad, but that does not make him wrong in this case.

It is quite clear to the rest of the world, including Western nations, that the US has perpetrated a war of agression the likes of which have not been seen or prosecuted since Nuremburg.


reply posted on 7-4-2008 @ 05:09 PM by forestlady
reply to post by jackinthebox




Hi JITB: Just to clarify: Mr. Parry did not set up my dad. Someone high up in the govt did - someone who was trying to pin the blame for Iran/Contra scandal, on my dad. They threatened to smear his reputation and destroy him unless he "resigned". (I will also add that Pres. Reagan wasn't involved in any of this.)

Mr. Parry took the bait and reported that my dad was one of the primary players - which he wasn't, he wasn't involved in it at all. When my dad requested a retraction, Mr. Parry refused. That's when dad sued him and won. He didn't go for money, he just wanted a retraction printed. Unfortunately, I keep finding his name as a guilty party in alot of books after 1982, when all this happened. They use Robert Parry for a reference or they use a source who got it from Robert Parry. At any rate, all roads to this reference keep coming back to Mr. Parry. He didnt set up my dad, but he didn't do his homework, either, and didn't seem to care much about the facts, even when presented to him. Thus, I don't think he's a very good journalist. He never interviewed my dad, or spoke to him, either, meaning he didn't get the other side of the story. To this day, my family are fighting writers who got misinformed. I'm about to contact one of them now to discuss a retraction.

Anyway, I don't know about the veracity of the Aljezeera paper, but in this instance, I think they got it right. This is an illegal, inhumane war and I do believe that Bush, Cheney and a few others are war criminals. Anyway, my 2 cents.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^