It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by darkwraith
I am turning Republican because I have made critical errors in judgement by relying on conspiracy and radical left wing websites which distorted the reality of the war on the ground. I was against war and felt sorry for the Iraq citizens.
Relying on any one type of media in this country is a bad idea. It's to the point that I get half of the news from outside the US, although there are a good many biased folks there too, but not like here.
However, now that I have had a chance to see the Democratic Presidential platform and have discovered much of the radical left wing bias to be exaggerated, I have found that the Republicans meant well when they were trying to defend the nation against terrorism.
If you mean Congress, then I agree. I do not agree so much with Bush. He has let slide some serious security failures
If you notice, much of the Democratic platform on defense tries to agree with the Bush
agenda. Well, you don't get much more experienced on defense than Wesley Clark, and
Colin Powell. And since the Democrats like Joe Biden and John Kerry voted for the
war, they must have for a reason. I now believe those reasons to be correct.
So from now on, I will support the war and the troops, and President Bush. I had believed his "your for us , or against us" was kind of mean and making enemies, but after thinking it over in the context of the seriousness of the risks, I feel he was correct.
I think it's bull# if you ask me. I don't know who he is trying to be, but if Bush thinks that it is ok to shoot out remarks like that when there is serious dissent among his people, then I think he is wrong. He is never clear about what he is talking about. He does not give us any specifics, etc. The public need something to go on here, there is almost rioting in the streets sometimes.
It is easy to become embroiled in emotional issues like war and death when the news messengers distort or exaggerate facts. Its easy not to trust news sources too when they try to conceal or ignore certain facts also. But now I understand it was for national security.
National Security. ~sigh~ this is a real gripe of mine. How is it, that he can ask us American's to give up certain freedoms for security (which is crap unless we are under attack or in a state of emergency) then why is he allowing Mexicans and other unmentionables to stroll across the border all fancy free? Makes no sense. There is a major unregulated and undocumentable access point in America. Does he think terrorists just don't know about it?
One commentator on Larry King Live said, "The Bill Of Rights is not a suicide pact."
I think I understand now. The United States military has a lot of work to do in protecting
America and we should support them in every way we can because they are making
the country safer.
True, we can't blame them for the politics, much like in Vietnam.
To all the people in the military and overseas, I sincerely apologize for misunderstanding the situation of the Iraq war and speaking out so vehemently against it. We have left-wing radio here, Pacifica KPFK (90.7) which broadcasts many negative comments about the war and its easy to feel angry when the message is distorted and things are exaggerated. I am sorry my comments were unduly harsh, but it was due mainly because of my religion where killing, is of course, wrong.
Much of the left wing press had been exaggerated esp. on the internet and it reinforced this perception. I feel that these people are doing a great disservice to the nation now, and think their attempts at reporting are misguided.
They have their agendas to push just like the Republicans, it's no different except that the Dems are out of power so they are making a bigger racket.
If the issue is safety and the government says its important then I believe them, and
trust they know what they are doing for the freedom of our nation, and to make security safer for democracies of the world.
As an american, and a conservative, you have a duty NOT to trust the government to dictate actions unregulated. We can either take action in what we believe or sit and not complain about what we did not work to avoid.
[Edited on 23-2-2004 by darkwraith]
Originally posted by darkwraith
If the issue is safety and the government says its important then I believe them, and
trust they know what they are doing for the freedom of our nation, and to make security safer for democracies of the world.
Originally posted by darkwraith
The United States military has a lot of work to do in protecting
America and we should support them in every way we can because they are making
the country safer.
To all the people in the military and overseas, I sincerely apologize for misunderstanding the situation of the Iraq war and speaking out so vehemently against it.
So from now on, I will support the war and the troops, and President Bush. I had believed his "your for us , or against us" was kind of mean and making enemies, but after thinking it over in the context of the seriousness of the risks, I feel he was correct.
Originally posted by darkwraith
The people need to be protected, from information as well as graphic depictions. Embedded journalists are necessary because the people need not see the things that might disrupt national security. Most people cannot stomach the violence and turmoil, and it is too disturbing for the average person.
Originally posted by enomus
So from now on, I will support the war and the troops, and President Bush. I had believed his "your for us , or against us" was kind of mean and making enemies, but after thinking it over in the context of the seriousness of the risks, I feel he was correct.
you do realize you probably have the same chances of being gang-raped to death by a group of lesbian girl scouts as you do being killed by a terrorist, right?
Tell that to the people who lost their lives on Sept. 11, or in the first WTC bombing, or in the OKC bombing or in the Unibomber bombings, or in the DC Sniper shootings, or in the numerous embassy bombings in the last decade.
Originally posted by enomus
Tell that to the people who lost their lives on Sept. 11, or in the first WTC bombing, or in the OKC bombing or in the Unibomber bombings, or in the DC Sniper shootings, or in the numerous embassy bombings in the last decade.
tally all those numbers and tell me what they come to. then lets compare those to the top 1000 leading causes of death in the U.S. and let's see what we're really talking about...i'd say we were in the 1 in 1,000,000 range at least.
i'm just saying lets be realistic, the chances of any american dying from a terrorist action is pretty slim and in no way, shape or form justifies the human lose and resources that are currently being utilized on this so called 'war' on terrorism. in my not-so-humble opinion, of course.