It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Atheist speculate as to why there is no god.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Atheist speculate as to why there is no god.
1: no we don't. we don't even have absolute certainty as to the question, let any reason to speculate as to why something we don't believe in doesn't exist..
2: atheism is not a religion
Originally posted by jmdewey60
You are not going to get the respose that you want because the practitioners of the religion you are tryng to describe are not going to talk about it.
Those are the secret societies that you have to go to some extint of vetting before they hand out the real facts of their religion.
These are worshipers of demons and devils that the church worked so hard to drive underground.
Christianity is the opposite of religions that try to exclude people.
Christians are pretty open about their religion because Jesus gave the great commission to his followers, to spread the word.
[edit on 24-3-2008 by jmdewey60]
Originally posted by Lightmare
If I were to say that my religion is "better" , it would miss the point. I could give a laundry list reasons why my religion is better, but that, also, would miss the point and could even be refuted. It is not about what religion is better and which are not.
When it comes to spiritual matters, I am interested in only one thing. THE TRUTH. I'm not interested in finding "my truth" or what "feels right to me". For such is the way of those who would try to mold the reality of the universe to suit their own tastes and emotions. It is not even possible and the truth is not that way. It is what it is, regardless of perception. Therefore, I will settle for nothing less than the truth.
I'm not here to tell anybody what to believe. All I can really say is that whatever religion gets me closest to the truth shall I not only consider to be better, I shall consider it the best.
[edit on 3/24/2008 by Lightmare]
Originally posted by raptorinvictus
Unfortunately many power hungary humans take it upon themselves to mis-interpret a relegion's teachings and knowledge and twist it to suit their own needs.
It is up to us to look at what is right and what is wrong. Weigh evrything that is told to you on a scale and then decide if its worth listining to.....including all that i have just blurted out here:-)
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
1) Atheist are "more" certain there is no god then the Agnostic, "show me the proof".
2) I agree, I don't see how atheism could be a religion.
that is assuming the gospel of mary is inspired of god... if god is all powerful, why is it so unreasonable to think that he would have the power to decide which books are included and which are not?
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
what are the qualities of the true religion?
1. are its teachings from god? or men?
2 tim 3:[16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
mark 7:[7] Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctines the commandments of men.
adherence to the bible is nessesary (sorry my english is horrible today)
....this is kind of why I didn't want scripture to be used to defend ones religion because it so debateable to its meaning. A person could say and even agree that it takes all of the pieces of a puzzle to in fact put the puzzle together completely. If in fact "all scripture is given by inspiration of God" then we are missing a lot of pieces to that puzzle. The gospel of Mary would be a good example. Relying on scripture is akin to relying on "positive" law and to disregard "natural" law. (St. Thomas Aquantis stuff)
Our Supreme Court can't even agree on how to interpret a document written just over 200 years ago, why should you even think that we can get the true meaning of translated words from 2000 years ago and longer. Yeah, oral tradition is great for them back then but still.
1 cor 5:[9] I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
[10] Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world.
[11] But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.
[12] For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
[13] But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.
[5] For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
Good example of why many of us don't go with the literal stuff. It goes against natural law for us that are about the Love and it goes against the logic that an Atheist or Agnostic would require.
I'm thinking that the fewer tenets a religion has the closer to the perfect religion it is, as long as there are no contradictions and it centers around love. All virtue has its orgin from love.
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
Originally posted by Lightmare
If I were to say that my religion is "better" , it would miss the point. I could give a laundry list reasons why my religion is better, but that, also, would miss the point and could even be refuted. It is not about what religion is better and which are not.
When it comes to spiritual matters, I am interested in only one thing. THE TRUTH. I'm not interested in finding "my truth" or what "feels right to me". For such is the way of those who would try to mold the reality of the universe to suit their own tastes and emotions. It is not even possible and the truth is not that way. It is what it is, regardless of perception. Therefore, I will settle for nothing less than the truth.
I'm not here to tell anybody what to believe. All I can really say is that whatever religion gets me closest to the truth shall I not only consider to be better, I shall consider it the best.
[edit on 3/24/2008 by Lightmare]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think I could have said it better myself. What religion is the closest to the truth? This is why I started this thread. I wanted to hear from peoples different "religions" and not necessarily a hybrid of personal beliefs. We all know we have them. Who has the religion that is closest to the truth? Because like you said it should be considered the best and if somehow that could be established then learning about it and tweaking it would be one step closer for us truth seekers.
Originally posted by snowflake_obsidian
Posting a bunch of passages from the bible is not going to turn a non-Christian to Christianity. I don't understand why Christians feel the need to do this; and quite honestly Miriam, the passages you posted makes God look like a jealous, temper tantrum throwing crybaby. I like to believe that God is above that and therefore I find the way that the bible portrays god is blasphemous.
Agnosticism has a lot of speculation. As one myself, I am constantly searching for truth and enlightenment and constantly questioning the things around me, which I feel is a good thing. I feel it keeps me on my toes. I feel that it's the followers of the major religions who follow blind like sheep.
Originally posted by miriam0566
let me ask you something? if you are married or are getting married, would you call you mate a jealous temper tantrum throwing baby because he/she asked for your exclusive love?
Originally posted by snowflake_obsidian
Originally posted by miriam0566
let me ask you something? if you are married or are getting married, would you call you mate a jealous temper tantrum throwing baby because he/she asked for your exclusive love?
If he asked for my exclusive love is not a reason for me to think of him as temper tantrum throwing baby. However if he demanded that I not speak to other guys and commanded that I follow a string of ridiculous rules relating to the matter (in the same way your bible portrays God) then yes I would.
I do respect your right to follow the bible. I am saying that using the bible to convince non-believers is a waste of time.
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
1) Atheist are "more" certain there is no god then the Agnostic, "show me the proof".
Originally posted by grimreaper797
A belief is just as powerful as not believing. Saying something is right is just as definate as saying something is wrong. Saying there is no god is just as powerful as saying there is one.
Both assume, both speculate. Atheism is a religion because it is based on the idea there is no god.
Other religions are religions because they base their believes on the idea there is a certain god, or a certain prophet, etc. Its still all somebody saying "I believe this". A christian believes in a christian god just like an atheist believes there is no god.
In that sort of way to look at what is going on, you have to know that we are on purpose not given enough information to make proper judgemants.
Originally posted by raptorinvictus
No religion is wrong. They all teach us beautiful things and we must respect that however what is wrong is blind faith in the words of other people. What a priest/monk/prophet tells you is probabely his interpretation of the knowledge held in the teachings of a relegion.
It is up to us to understand it in light of the situation we are in and apply it to our lives in the right way.
Generally speaking the mantra live and let live works best.
Do what you want as long as you dont harm others.
I'm about the "golden rule" ....treat others as you would like to be treated.
if god doesn´t exist = doesn´t matter what you do.
Originally posted by raptorinvictus
I think we are going a little off topic here.
The question that Res Ipsa asked is that why is your religion better.
My answer is that all religions have good teachings. There is no religion in the world that tells you to commit crimes or rape children. The problems start when humans mis-interpret religion or bend its teachings to suit their own needs.
All religions tell you to respect life and god's creations. No religion tells you to nuke the planet.
And i agre with Res in saying
I'm about the "golden rule" ....treat others as you would like to be treated.
If you truly beleave that a sucide bomber knows he is doing something wrong then think about this...would you fear a man with a knife who wants to steal your bread but knows that he is doing something very wrong and his guilt is getting to him or would you fear a mother who (is misinformed yet still) beleaves that you killed her child and wants revenge.
No one wakes up in the morning, thinks ''oh i am bored lets blow up a building for religious reasons''
You would only take drastic action only if you truly,deeply beleave in the cause and that is what people take advantage of.
They would brainwash you into beleaving that becoming a terrorist is the right thing to do and people with weak minds might fall for this.
As for forgiving hitler, it is people like him that do the brainwashing. Hitler said it is for race and country, The religious terrorist leaders say its for their god.
Also you said
if god doesn´t exist = doesn´t matter what you do.
If you truly beleave that then try answering this.
Do you only do the right thing because god tell you?
and if there was no concequence on you for mass murder you would do it just because you can and get away with it?
Would you steal if you know you can not get caught?
The answers might scare you.