This topic is in the Deconstructing Disinformation & Deflection discussion forum.  (rss)


!The Rodin Con Exposed?




Topic started on 29-2-2008 @ 12:39 PM by sansiden


To all those familiar with Rodins work, check out this:

farm3.static.flickr.com...

His theory indeed! I counted 17 serious flaws in his work if you'd like me too reel them off, by all means ask.

Heres the first to get you started, vortex mathematics is a rude interpretation of (1500BC) Vedic mathematics. Which is beautifully explained on about.com

hinduism.about.com...

They are the geniuses, check out this little chestnut:

If you want to find the square of 45, you can employ the Ekadhikena Purvena sutra ("By one more than the one before"). The rule says since the first digit is 4 and the second one is 5, you will first have to multiply 4 (4 +1), that is 4 X 5, which is equal to 20 and then multiply 5 with 5, which is 25. Viola! The answer is 2025. Now, you can employ this method to multiply all numbers ending with 5.



[edit on 29-2-2008 by sansiden]

[edit on 29-2-2008 by sansiden]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-2-2008 @ 02:04 PM by sansiden


The language of pattern is worth reading on Mystery mathematics



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2008 @ 01:44 AM by nibbler



Originally posted by sansiden
To all those familiar with Rodins work, check out this:

farm3.static.flickr.com...

His theory indeed! I counted 17 serious flaws in his work if you'd like me too reel them off, by all means ask.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-3-2008 @ 01:45 AM by nibbler



Originally posted by nibbler
Originally posted by sansiden
To all those familiar with Rodins work, check out this:

farm3.static.flickr.com...

His theory indeed! I counted 17 serious flaws in his work if you'd like me too reel them off, by all means ask.




Thank you for the link to "his theory indeed" I was not aware of that.
I would like to see the 17 flaws.

I have known Rodin since 1995.

Edited to correct quotes


[edit on 3/19/2008 by benevolent tyrant]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 27-6-2008 @ 10:21 PM by Maya432


hmmmm.... he never came back to show us the 17 flaws.

come back please.... I don`t care if he is proven or right..
I only search the truth....

but I do hope he is proven wrong or right..
he seems like a very interesting soul indeed.

[edit on 27-6-2008 by Maya432]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.013 seconds
Page processed in 0.077 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread