It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrJingles
I doubt a nuke would do anything to divert the path of a comet.
Frankly I think that you would have better success terreforming Venus. much more raw material to work with.
i dont approve of the idea of nuking mars, thats just terrible.
it needs to be done in phases, obviously.
Originally posted by Amuk
The only problem with that is Venus day is longer than its year which means that the same side stays toward the sun.......... mostly
Originally posted by ArchAngel
Not nuking Mars. Using a nuke to divert a comet.
[Edited on 17-2-2004 by ArchAngel]
Originally posted by ArchAngel
The second mission would carry the second wave of smaller nukes and another device that would land on Mars and monitor the impact with a few simple sensors..
Originally posted by Amorymeltzer
Originally posted by ArchAngel
The second mission would carry the second wave of smaller nukes and another device that would land on Mars and monitor the impact with a few simple sensors..
it seems to me u jsut posted three sites that all said the same thing, the first two in exact same words. i dont see how any of this relates to terraforming. we tried to see the temperature of the poles, and we #ed up.
Originally posted by ArchAngel
What if the Mars Polar Lander was not really on that rocket? What if it did not fail, but went on to do a different mission?