reply to post by ProfEmeritus
Hmm.. The "greatest" .. And we would have to look into each persons respected place in history. We cannot take the likes of Alexander the Great,
and compare him to George Washington, or Napoleon to Ivan the Terrible!
And even if you cut it down to categories.. greatest women for example.. Queen Elizabeth I, Ellenor Roosevelt.. for their time, they each did
something to combat the odds that make them great. Harriet Tubman while poor as dirt and all the odds against her, may have been more successful then
Queen Elizabeth, or Joan De Arc? But then again, Joan was not freeing slaves, and Elizabeth was not poor..
So perhaps the question can remain, and we can choose our favorite icon.. of which I have none, there are to many men and women in history I idolize,
to many I still can read of their tales and remain in awe at their accomplishments and what little I have done to the world.
It is my personal opinion, that great people are made, not born, that each of these people climbed a difficult ladder, against the odds, against the
norms of their times and made accomplishments that changed the face of the world for ever.
Be it Leonardo's paintings but a learning disability that inhibited his inventions from being formalized, Napoleons organization ability (we still
use street addresses) yet famous arrogance, or Cesar's sheer luck for being a terrible gambler, or Hannibal's amazing war skills, just to loose it
all through a lack of political understanding..
It shows that these men and women, where normal people.
But who do we idolize now? Britney? Bush? Clinton? What will people think when they look back 200 years from now? We had the romantic Paul
Revere, Washington, Franklin, Patton, Eisenhower, JFK, Roosevelt..
I think they will look back and see a cultural dark age.
I don't know where I am going with this anymore,
My point is I do not select one figure from history as my favorite, but instead reflect on the fact that one person could obtain such fame to begin
with.