It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by reject
The symbols shown by the UFO in stephenville seem reminiscent of sigils kind of like those found in the necronomicon.
Actually, it was described by eyewitnesses as pulsing symbols and a sky snake. this makes it impossible that this was an image artifact as it was also observed as such by naked eyes.
Originally posted by TLomon
Originally posted by reject
The symbols shown by the UFO in stephenville seem reminiscent of sigils kind of like those found in the necronomicon.
Although I think the sigils are interesting, it might help your credibility if you don't compare them to a work of fiction. In my opinion, I have to agree eaglewingz that this is all due to camera movement, and no secret message being transmitted.
courtesy of earthfiles
5:30 AM Central, January 20, 2008, More Pulsing Aerial Symbols
Then seven hours later at 5:30 AM Central, on January 20, 2008, a Glen Rose resident named Joan had risen for a new day when she noticed symbols pulsing in the sky. She picked up her digital still camera and took the one image below. But she told Steve Allen that she watched the moving “sky snake” changing shapes for several minutes.
Which means it really looked that way and not just because of the camera as you said earlier.
Originally posted by TLomon
And I can do the same effect to your eyes in a dark room with a glow stick. Heck, a lit cigarette even. The human eyes will see trailers when watching a moving light in a dark environment.
no offense taken...I was having technical issues
Originally posted by TLomon
Well, you wanted to say something. If you like, send it to me in a U2U. I will admit that my critique of your post was a bit harsh, and I apologize if you took offense to it. However, I still feel theories should be based on fact, not fiction.
Now about the “terrible and forbidden books” — I am forced to say that most of them are purely imaginary. There never was any Abdul Alhazred or Necronomicon, for I invented these names myself. Robert Bloch devised the idea of Ludvig Prinn and his De Vermis Mysteriis, while the Book of Eibon is an invention of Clark Ashton Smith's. Robert E. Howard is responsible for Friedrich von Junzt and his Unaussprechlichen Kulten.... As for seriously-written books on dark, occult, and supernatural themes — in all truth they don’t amount to much. That is why it’s more fun to invent mythical works like the Necronomicon and Book of Eibon.