Hillary's healthcare plan could have power to garnish wages, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 4-2-2008 @ 11:16 AM by Digital_Reality

Hillary's healthcare plan could have power to garnish wages


news.yahoo.com
Pressed on how she would enforce her mandate, Clinton said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment."

She said such measures would apply only to workers who can afford health coverage but refuse to buy it, which puts undue pressure on hospitals and emergency rooms. Under her plan, she said, health care "will be affordable for everyone" because she would limit premium payments "to a low percent of your income."

(visit the link for the full news article)


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 02:09 PM by sbob
The only good thing I see of this is we would be paying for something right then and there, and not just playing numbers like Social Security and huge debt for our children.

Like it or not you get Social Security out of your paycheck. Will it be there for us?

Healthcare for corporate profits seems like it isn't working to me. A non-profit...As in break even paying fair salaries, and giving world class care. When you put adds on tv and radio, that is one less person getting care. And huge salaries for upper management. When special interest groups pay money to stop States and the Federal Government from getting lower RX wholesale prices. That is a joke.

We don't mind paying for the well being of our roads with federal money, or our military. Why not privatize all our roads and military, and get the federal government out of that too? One of George Bush's few vetos was to not insure millions of children. You know why, because they can't vote. The RX program he did for seniors (as they can vote)would of been fine with me if he had money for it. But he cut taxes.

We have great healthcare for people who can afford it. The system we have is set up to favor certain people. Why not help out a bit to even the field a litte for once.

Look I don't have really any of the answers. But when 10's of millions of people could get some preventive care early, instead of us paying for more expensive catostropic care later. That is not a first world country to me, that is middle ages. Let's give it a try.

The change might work it or it might not. But a healthier population is like good roads it is good for the country.


reply posted on 4-2-2008 @ 02:14 PM by Digital_Reality
reply to post by pyrytyes



I know, its almost surreal when you think about it. I love it when they save our money for us until we get old and spend it themselves. I should be charging the government interest on the loan I give them in the form of Social Security payments.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^