Originally posted by AJ Lavender
reply to post by SimonSays
While there are numerous theories that suggest 9/11 was pre-planned, no one has produced overwhelming evidence, no smoking gun. If you work in
Washington, you won't latch on to a politically career-ending theory unless you can see the end game and know that you will come out smelling like
In the last few posts comments have been made alluding to "no evidence linking insiders with involvement in 9/11" This is of untrue of couse- there
is a mountain of circumstantial evidence, but no paper trail or confession.
Does this mean that people should not even consider the possibility?
Many criminal cases producing convictions do so without a single shred of physical evidence or a confession from the accused. The case is
circumstantial , relying on the motive, means, and opportunity of the accused to establish culpabilty for the crime.
A classic case that bears striking parallels to the crimes of 9/11 is the crimes of the Nazi regime of Adolph Hitler, specifically the systematic
murder of millions of Jews.
It is generally accepted that Hitler personally planned and implemented this mass slaughter. If you ask most people they will say "the evidence
against Hitler is overwhelming" he is therefore guilty. To date there is not one shred of physical evidence or of course a confession by Adolph to
the ordering of or involvement in these crimes. And this crime was carried out on a vast scale over several years involving hundreds of thousands of
people in its commission.The reason people have concluded that he is guilty is because he stated that he wanted to do it in his Manifesto "Mein
Kampf"(My Veiw) this is known as "Motive", and when he rose to power and gained the means to carry out his publicly stated goal it happened.
Motive, Means, Opportunity
Does this mean that in the absence of a document titled "Our plan to seize total control of America by carrying out a false flag attack upon its
citizens" signed by those in charge of the operation or of a public confession by Dick Cheney and others who are accused of the crimes of Black
Tuesday that they are innocent?
The government insiders who are accused by many of carrying out this crime also had a Manifesto. It is called the "Project for the New American
Century" and its signatories include Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, And the Goldenboy of the Bush Crime Family Jeb. In a document titled rebuilding
Americas defenses they state their goal of total American hegemony worldwide and alluding to what would be necessary to happen for them to make this
desire a reality-namely a "New Pearl Harbor" to get Americans behind this insane agenda. When they gained the means and opportunity to make this
"New Pearl Harbor" happen- IT DID.
Motive, Means, Opportunity
Heres a link to the PNAC site for those who have never bothered to read who they blindly support. The second one is the document "Rebuilding Americas