It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hollywoodbaby
.........yes this could be the case in fact it could very well be that C is a local constant after all.. Therefore with this in mind how old is the universe really??
Originally posted by hereticalmind
If the milky way galaxy is 100,000 Light yrs in diameter, and the universe is 14.5 billion lights yrs that only leaves room for 145,000 milky way sized galaxies.
I realize most galaxies are probably smaller(some larger) but scientist claim there may be hundreds of billions of galaxies.
Where would they all fit?
Scientists have long believed that only the Doppler effect or Gravity as described by Einstein could account for wavelength shifts in the spectrum of light as it travels through space....
Thus the assumption that quasars—beamed electromagnetic radiators with large redshifts—are part of the "Hubble flow" of an expanding universe could be wrong. This effect should also apply to normal galaxies, most of whose matter is in the plasma state.
The fact that red shifts appear to be quantized has interesting implications for the study of the universe. This suggests that the red shift may be caused by something other than the expansion of the universe, at least in part. This could be a loss of energy of light rays as they travel, or a decrease in the speed of light through discrete levels. Maybe there is some other explanation
"It seems likely that redshift may not be due to an expanding Universe, and much of the speculations on the structure of the universe may require re-examination."
(Edwin Hubble, PASP, 1947)
Originally posted by hereticalmind
I am having a problem figuring out this equation. It is probably very simple maybe someone can help me.
If the milky way galaxy is 100,000 Light yrs in diameter, and the universe is 14.5 billion lights yrs that only leaves room for 145,000 milky way sized galaxies.
I realize most galaxies are probably smaller(some larger) but scientist claim there may be hundreds of billions of galaxies.
Where would they all fit?
Nice question! What about the potential and kinetic energies of galaxies? id imagine those numbers are beyond imagination! maybe it's just one big perpetual motion machine that got it's kick start from the big bang!
Originally posted by allMIGHTY
So the universe must also have a constant energy supply, right?.
Originally posted by masterp
The universe is not 14.5 billion light years across...it's 93 billion light years across. The universe is 14.5 light years old.
Originally posted by Physicsrus
Sorry, but you all are confusing yourselves. Let's start with the basics.
The universe is infinite.
The universe is homogeneous.
c (speed of light) is constant at 300,000,000 m/s
Originally posted by Fada126
Originally posted by masterp
The universe is not 14.5 billion light years across...it's 93 billion light years across. The universe is 14.5 light years old.
I read that one aswell and what i dont get is that according to how they explained it, it should only be double the 14.5 billion light years! two objects speeding away from eachother at 1 light year a year equals 2 light years traveled, which gives a grand total of 29 billion light years!
Originally posted by GavCg
Originally posted by Physicsrus
Sorry, but you all are confusing yourselves. Let's start with the basics.
The universe is infinite.
The universe is homogeneous.
c (speed of light) is constant at 300,000,000 m/s
i would like to know where/how/prove/why the universe is 1) finite
[edit on 17-1-2008 by GavCg]