It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You challenged John Lear's expertise. That makes it your challenge. John countered your challenge to him with action not just words.
You got your absurd presumption from my words you cited?
This is a perfect example of why you are having so many problems with so many people here. You just can't let it go and get over it. Seriously if this is how you act when you interact with people on a daily basis, you must have serious social problems. Let this sink in. I apologized and in return you continue insulting me. How incredibly immature.
The word enlightment is giving you a comprehension problem, is it?
Originally posted by OrionStars
reply to post by jfj123
Body remains still have to be intact to get DNA from some body parts but not all.
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to post by OrionStars
Unfortunately I live in Michigan. I said I'd really like to do it but I can't fly out to vegas, it's simply not practical.
Why in the world would you think there is some kind of fund raising group on either side of the DISCUSSION??? Are you serious???
How badly do you want to prove your points of argument? People set on proving their points make time and find the money to do it to prove their points of argument.
I do not believe I mentioned any fund raising groups. Why did you presume that is what I meant?
Surely among your side people could donate to send one of you to try out your hypothesis, can't they? Surely there are organized groups with money promoting your side of the argument. You could contact them to help some of you prove your hypothesis for them and yourselves.
Surely there are organized groups with money promoting your side of the argument.
Originally posted by jfj123
No I didn't. John didn't come into this discussion until a ways after I posted my opinion. Check your facts.
The timing does not matter. The fact is you have continuously challenged his expertise, from the time he offered his reasoning via his expertise to these discussions.
Now he counters his opposition, among them you, to make the effort to prove your own points of argument beyond your biased opinions. Talk the talk and walk the walk is what John is doing. You are backsliding when offered the same opportunity to talk the talk and not agreeing to walk the walk from your opposition opinionated view.
According to you: You made your opinionated points first. John then countered with his expertise second. You continued to counter John with your opinions. Now he has finally countered you to put actions to work to prove your opinions correct. You continue to backslide by talking the talk but not walking the walk to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Ok, enlightenment if you prefer that word. It is still for your enlightment, not ours, if you accept John Lear's offer to try what you think could have happen. He is giving you and your side unique opportunity to prove it.
If you do not quit the ad hominem attacks against other posters, the one lacking credibility continues to be you.
Originally posted by Jeff Riff
Will you be willing to accept the conclusions that we can draw if there is over a 75% failure rate?
The timing does not matter. The fact is you have continuously challenged his expertise, from the time he offered his reasoning via his expertise to these discussions.
Now he counters his opposition, among them you, to make the effort to prove your own points of argument beyond your biased opinions.
Talk the talk and walk the walk is what John is doing.
You are backsliding when offered the same opportunity to talk the talk and not agreeing to walk the walk from your opposition opinionated view.
According to you: You made your opinionated points first. John then countered with his expertise second.
You continued to counter John with your opinions.
Now he has finally countered you to put actions to work to prove your opinions correct.
You continue to backslide by talking the talk but not walking the walk to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt.'
Originally posted by OrionStars
But I do not need it, and you do. It was offered to your side not mine.
Yes there must be body parts to get DNA from the body parts. This is true. Eye witnesses at the crash site stated there were body parts everywhere. Even John Lear says that there were body parts the only difference is that he says they were planted. Are you going to challenge John about that or just me?
Originally posted by eyewitness86
Why is it disrespectful to imagine a scenario that allows the passengers and or pilots to remain alive? There is no evidence they died, that for sure. I do not agree with John Lear on this count, but since we know the official story is a total lie any other possibility remains a viable option.
Originally posted by OrionStars
Since John Lear also takes the view no alleged planes were involved, I seriously doubt John or anyone else taking the same view thinks humans were in the air flying without aircraft surrounding them.