so... will usa destroy their nukes too?, page 3

I just saw a report on MSNBC that people were starting to question this. I did not hear who was making the comments, but I will try to find out any info I can.

I was actually reading the Dan Rather-Saddam interview transcript and I know most will not like this, but then again it contributes partly to the NWO Conspiracy, Hussein stated:
I say to the honest Americans that if such a thing happens, do not capitulate, do not give in. You have to defend your country, defend your family and your honor. Do not commit aggression against us. And, as you know, we have not committed any aggression against the United States. The United States intelligence (UNINITEL) against our country, our people, our children.
am speaking now with you, and maybe airplanes, warplanes, American warplanes, are flying over Iraqi air space, over south or north, and dropping ammunition, weapons that�are destroying property, property belonging to our citizens, our population -- either private property or public property, because public property also belongs to the people. This is happening daily.
So when such a law is wished to prevail in the world, to govern the world, whether it's in possession of huge powers and has the right to destroy others or to control others and then you have to accept their control or their domination, such a law does not possess the basics, the most basic elements or ingredients of morality and the most basic ingredients of faith, whichever this power might be. Regardless of this power, this state of affairs will be the law of the jungle, and we are people who believe in our destiny and we will not accept any law of the jungle. It is our duty, it is our responsibility to defend our country, to defend our children, to defend our people, and we are not going to succumb, neither to the United States nor to any other power.

The thing that got me was "to govern the world".
He also goes on to explain that "when Mr. Tariq Aziz, as Foreign Minister, had a meeting with Secretary James Baker -- that was in January in Geneva. Baker threatened Tariq Aziz with something that he hoped that Tariq Aziz would bring back to�the government of Iraq."
" They began talking about Iraq possibly having produced WMD, weapons of mass destruction, after and that they have information or data to that effect. We have said that Iraq has not produced any such weapons. What does that mean? It means that what they had threatened with -- pushing Iraq back into the pre-industrial age - had not actually taken place, that they could not do that to Iraq, what they had threatened Iraq with in - through Baker in - had not taken place. So nobody can metamorphosis. Nobody can sort of take Iraq apart. That is not fair to the will of Allah, and it's not fair to the people of Iraq who are facing the difficulties in resolve and through serious work and through creativity."
"The United States can destroy - but the question is, why should America destroy? And why should America generate hostility - the hostility of the world -- towards the United States?
Did the Americans obtain the weapons in order to control and dominate the world? Or did those (UNINTEL) and the taxpayers (UNINTEL). Did they do that in order to control the world?� (UNINTEL) the USA. I believe that the scientists of the United States and the people of the United States and the taxpayers of the United States, when they paid that, when they supported that, that was for the basic defense of the United States. Is it right? Is it right? Is it acceptable that anybody, any official, anyone in power, once he is in possession of a weapon, then he should go and take that weapon to destroy other people?"

I believe in the fact that Iraq did not threaten the US. Where they a threat? If you base your information on their past actions, Yes. As far as coming over here and attacking us, they don't have the capability to. The UN inspectors that were in Iraq prior to the start of the war did not find any WMD. If I remember correctly, they had asked for more time. As it turns out so far, there isn't any. I believe we had built weapons and arsenals for defense of our homeland, not to use them on a country that in hindsight we went to war with on false pretenses. Why did we not spend all this time looking for OBL? He is the ring leader, Right? OBL has come out and said that he had no ties with Saddam or Iraq, and vice-versa, wether it is truth or not, it has not been concretely disputed. Maybe the Iraqi people see what is happening to the US under GW, I don't know. Remember Vice President Richard Cheney says that if and when an American-led Army comes into Iraq, it will be greeted with music. It will be treated as a Army of liberation.

I have not seen the country embrace our presence like this.