Soviet Moon Images, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 27 times


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 01:57 PM by buddhasystem
reply to post by Atticus_Black


Regarding the cylindrical object in this pic -- the picture was taken by the Soviet Luna-13 craft, the one that had a pretty hard landing -- you can see that the antennas in the picture are all bent out of shape, and this was not supposed to happen. Basically, a few external parts broke off.

en.wikipedia.org...


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 02:22 PM by biggie smalls
reply to post by MajorMalfunction


It is kind of tough to say that about a black and white photo...Not to mention the bases could all be underground MMF .

If there are bases on the moon and other celestial bodies (which I believe is quite possible) they are most likely cloaked in some way (active camo or otherwise).

Active camouflage is being developed for moving infantry soldiers, why could it not exist on a large scale and developed for a black budget military?



reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 02:25 PM by Daz3d-n-Confus3d
reply to post by mikesingh


Maybe Lunar Rover tracks?



Other than that what are we looking at in these pictures? Is there something unusual about these moon pics that we have not seen before?


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:06 PM by gottago
Ok, here's one, I call it the Moonstick, comes from the Zond 8 mission, here is the original photo, it's on the left edge about halfway down.




So just what the heck is that?

[edit on 7-1-2008 by gottago]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:18 PM by sherpa
reply to post by gottago


Forgive me but I think you have the wrong source image as they do not match.

Might be a good idea to have another look just to avoid confusion.


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:25 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by cbianchi513


[off-topic]

OMG! That was an awesome and engaging novel!

Certainly among Heinlein's best works, IMHO.

It took the Hugo, you know.

I shed a tear when "Mike" "died."

I heard there was a movie script being floated about...

[/off-topic]

reply to post by buddhasystem

Are you sure, BS, that the giant lunar ant wasn't tearing those pieces of debris off the lander as the pics were taken?

Seriously, thanks for the info on the hard landing...maybe it had such a rough time because the moon has a higher gravity than what's been reported as "official," eh?



So has anyone yet found anymore anomalies?

Mike?





[edit on 7-1-2008 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:28 PM by gottago
reply to post by sherpa


Just checked my post, that's the correct original image I linked to and took the detail from. It's right on the edge, a bit less than halfway down the left-hand side of the image. Just below the large crater with the flattened lower edge

[edit on 7-1-2008 by gottago]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:32 PM by completenuttergit
reply to post by mikesingh



Mike, ignoring the rock in the foreground on that pic, what about the grey trying to find his contact lens in the farground just left of centre a little way up , on all fours he is ...

bianchi ... its only the Union Jack when flown from a mast , otherwise its the Union Flag ....

Regards

Git


[edit on 7-1-2008 by completenuttergit]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:34 PM by goosdawg
reply to post by gottago


It looks like the link and the little preview are of two different areas.

Are you sure you've got the right area for the big link?

'Cause I don't see anything that looks like a "Moonstick."


Edit to add: Nevermind, I think I see it now, sorry...



[edit on 7-1-2008 by goosdawg]


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 07:43 PM by gottago
reply to post by goosdawg


It's sticking out to the right, like a long toppled pole of some sorts, and is casting a shadow. I can't make out what's immediately below it and to the left, but that's not a crater either.



reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 09:51 PM by weedwhacker
reply to post by styxxz


styzzx,

See how rumours get started?? NO, no rovers on Venus.

After looking at all of these Moon pics, am I the only one who just sees...the Moon?

Another thread shows a Spirit Rover (yes, there IS a rover...on Mars!)
picture from last year (Earth year 2007).

My gosh! People saw a man in a hat, they saw water, and grass!!!

I mean, people can see the Pope in a Pizza if the look hard enough!!


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 09:58 PM by buddhasystem
reply to post by Anti_


The absence of stars in lunar pics has been explained about 10,000 times as the effect of film exposure -- the object being photographed is quite bright, and the stars are very dim compared to it.


reply posted on 7-1-2008 @ 10:09 PM by biggie smalls
styxxz,

nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Venera 7 was launched from a Tyazheliy Sputnik in an earth parking orbit towards Venus to study the Venusian atmosphere and other phenomena of the planet. Venera 7 entered the atmosphere of Venus on December 15, 1970, and a landing capsule was jettisoned. After aerodynamic braking, a parachute system was deployed. The capsule antenna was extended, and signals were returned for 35 min. Another 23 min of very weak signals were received after the spacecraft landed on Venus. The capsule was the first man-made object to return data after landing on another planet.


en.wikipedia.org...

www.mentallandscape.com...



Buddhasystem,

If you reread my post you will notice I said nothing about definitive cloaking technology. In fact, it would be more likely every picture with a possible base had been etch-a-sketched out of any photograph released to the public.

[edit on 1/7/2008 by biggie smalls]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^