It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Legalizer
Well its not your child, not your medical bill, not your choice, so if you are offended, get your nose out of other people's business.
That solves your problem.
Originally posted by Legalizer
I think if people can get as close as possible to perfection than let them.
There is no point breeding broken children if something can be done about it in advance.
Originally posted by Legalizer
Would you take delivery on anything if there manufacturer told you in advance its severely damaged.
Originally posted by Legalizer
Remember there has always been this genetic choosing:
"I wouldn't do it with you if you were the last man/woman on earth"
and the adverse
"Thats a fine specimen of man/woman you married, what a cute kid"
Originally posted by sty
..i agree it is even good to denny the right of those parents to have children if there is a risk for the kids to be deaf...
Originally posted by loam
Tinker with your own body all you like. But nothing grants you the right to make that decision for others. I don't care if it's your offspring or not.
The problem here is that you appear to be so enamored by the possible benefits of such technology, you fail to consider it's likely consequences.
In an unregulated environment, such technology will become the biological windfall of only those with means.
It is one thing to live with material distinctions, but when those differences become substantially biological...
Originally posted by Astyanax
...but soon enough parents will be trying to manipulate the appearance, fitness, intelligence and for all I know the body odour of their children to whatever extent they can. This is the future, oppose it how you will. You may not want it for your children, but you may be sure they will want it for theirs.
Originally posted by Astyanax
...change is always inevitable and the attempt to deny reality is futile.
Originally posted by Astyanax
No technology has ever been bound by prohibition.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Human genetic engineering is the future, and the future belongs to those who embrace it with courage.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Take comfort, my friend. We and our hominid ancestors have had technology for two million years and it hasn't killed us yet. On the contrary, it has done very well by us: made us the most successful species of our size on the planet. It'll make gods of us yet, if we don't lose our backbones. So buck up!
Originally posted by Astyanax
All technology is initially the province of those with means because all technologies start out expensive. This is a good thing; the rich are slightly more likely to have the education and worldly experience to deal with novelty in a sensible way.
Originally posted by Astyanax
But who's talking about an unregulated environment? We know this stuff is going to be regulated almost to the point of strangulation. To imagine any different is to indulge in fantasy.
Originally posted by Astyanax
You think material distinctions aren't biological? Take a look around you.
Originally posted by loam
Under this logic, child neglect, endangerment, abuse, or even infanticide would be protected activities.
Originally posted by loam
Despite what you think, children are not the PROPERTY of those who bear them.
Originally posted by loam
It is my business, so long as the consequences of your actions affect me, others and potentially society itself.
Well lets see there are about 6 billion dysfunctional people on the planet right now. Add that to the total number of dysnfunctional people that were ever born by without any engineering and thats your starting number.
Originally posted by loam
And how many 'broken' children will you have to go through before you reach perfection?
Originally posted by loam
Children are not goods.
Originally posted by Legalizer
Remember there has always been this genetic choosing:
"I wouldn't do it with you if you were the last man/woman on earth"
and the adverse
"Thats a fine specimen of man/woman you married, what a cute kid"
Originally posted by loam
That is not even close to what is being generally proposed here.
'Natural' selection is done in the context of thousands of years.
Originally posted by loam
The historical environmental, biological and cultural context for such choices has natural limits... If we begin to tinker with humanity in a way that negates these limits, we could face consequences far greater than any suffered by a single individual.
Originally posted by loam
I don't see everyone in my neighborhood with their own personal arsenal of nukes.
Originally posted by marg6043
Changing your body or appearance is a personal choice make by the individual person, changing genetically an embryo is not.
Originally posted by marg6043
Deny ignorance.
Originally posted by marg6043
Again master race comes to mind.
Originally posted by zerotime
The day this starts will be the day that human rights are given to embryos to protect them.