It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DocMoreau
Hmmm... I wonder if tall, muscular, good-looking, blond blue eyed people should be allowed to screen their embryos to insure that they don't get a ugly, weak dark haired baby?
Originally posted by marg6043
Why not? because family genetic characteristics are part of individuality.
This is what the nazis wanted to do when trying to recreate the master race.
I am all for genetics been used to stop major crippling and life threatening diseases from happening base on family history...
Originally posted by OhZone
Do you think that perfecting the human bondy and mind is a bad thing?
Originally posted by Legalizer
To create genetically deficient children on purpose is absurd.
Originally posted by marg6043
So should we also play with the color of the skin to make one that is more appealing to all? and less offensive to some.
* * *
Originally posted by loam
Originally posted by Legalizer
To create genetically deficient children on purpose is absurd.
And systemically eliminating them is just as bad, if not far worse.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Right now we are talking about eliminating the deficiency, not the child. This is not a thread about abortion. You two are in danger of derailing a very interesting discussion; refrain, I beg you.
Originally posted by loam
There is a material difference between what you do to yourself (eyelid surgery and skin whitening examples) and what you impose upon another.
IN THIS THREAD, the discussion...
In terms of my responses to OhZone and Legalizer, I was addressing the concepts that we should genetically "perfect" human beings and "do something proactive about troublesome genetic results."
To me, those concepts are sufficiently related to the thread topic to comment upon...and are just as offensive to me as the example presented by the OP.
Originally posted by loam
To me, those concepts are sufficiently related to the thread topic to comment upon...and are just as offensive to me as the example presented by the OP.
Originally posted by Astyanax
What is the material difference between this and genetically manipulating them towards a similar ideal?
Originally posted by Astyanax
Thread topics mutate as the discussion proceeds. All I ask of you and Legalizer is that you don't turn this into an abortion thread.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Genetic 'perfection' is an unattainable goal because it does not exist.
Originally posted by Astyanax
As for the potentially attainable goal of tinkering with one's children's genomes in order to make them fitter, happier, prettier and potentially richer, I certainly think people are entitled to do so if they wish. As I said to Doc Moreau, no-one's asking you to join in. If you want to stay unevolved, and keep your children that way too, that's your privilege.