It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by drunk
Errr CF it wasnt really a zombie movie as i said in my original post O.K i should've said it was the best British movie of its genre i've seen.
Originally posted by kurtcobainuk
28 days later was an unscary and pointless film. why does everyone think its great? the main characters were stupid i mean why waste time writing out hello in material when HELP is a damn sight shorter.
Originally posted by dreamlandmafia
That was the worst movie EVER. It wasnt scary whatsoever and the story was just plain stupid.That was a waste of 3.50$ and 2 hours ill never get back.
Originally posted by cmdrkeenkid
i thought it was hilarious... that and house of 1000 corpses are just great for a laugh... not scary at all though. old alfred hitchcock movies were scary...
Originally posted by Colonel
If you want good horror, rent a Japanese horror flick. Now, those movies will upset you.
Originally posted by BangorangRufio
$3.50? I went to see it on a date, on a Saturday night. With popcorn and everything it came to be about 20 dollars. And the best part was we went to see it the first week it was out, without the new endings... So I only saw the one ending. I thought it was okay, I mean I've seen worse (Resident Evil).