posted on Nov, 21 2007 @ 02:06 PM
Realtruth that is the real truth right there. Police cannot be everywhere, they are not personal protectors, however that good old .40 is always
wherever I am. I know how to use it, and if needed I wouldnt hesitate to put someone down before they got me, or my family. the whole is it a
personal right or does it mean a militia is just whitewash. Some crafty politician says well look here it is and here is why, then some person that
hasnt learned to think with their own minds sees it and says well that is what he/she said and they made it a law. They know more then me, so that
must be true. Our founding fathers fought, and created that document to preserve individual freedom, to preserve a way of life that the people
decide, what is best not the government. I believe to truly understand, and be 100% clear on what our founding fathers meant when they wrote the
second amendment. You have to sit down and read their writings on the individuals right to keep and bear arms, and what they meant in that time as an
organized militia. Those days a militia was the people every able bodied male was part of the militia, and as being such, they INDIVIDUALLY kept arms
in their homes in case they were called to serve. Now a days crafty propaganda has labeled militia not attached to the government as extremist. The
national gaurd is absolutely not a militia, the national gaurd is the military controlled by the government, not by the people. Our founding fathers
would say no no no you got it all wrong, you guys are supposed to keep them in check not the other way around.
This is bordering dangerous territory, what happens if they find that the second amendment isnt an individual right? I really doubt it will stop
in DC, I would say they would move forward with that pretty rapidly to the rest of the country. That is the perfect way to gain ultimate control, you
cant fight for all your freedoms when you dont have anything to fight with. keep your powder dry.