It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by adjay
Whoever posted the maths for the impact force - while the maths are generally correct, it is calculating total impact force of that mass - which is not a correct indication of all the forces and stresses present at the time of impact. Imagine putting some hen eggs along the leading edges of the wings - the eggs do not become capable of penetrating steel just because there is a huge mass behind it.
Originally posted by adjay
Whoever posted the maths for the impact force - while the maths are generally correct, it is calculating total impact force of that mass - which is not a correct indication of all the forces and stresses present at the time of impact. Imagine putting some hen eggs along the leading edges of the wings - the eggs do not become capable of penetrating steel just because there is a huge mass behind it.
Originally posted by neformore
Its not very often on ATS I'll come out and say that another poster is talking complete and utter rubbish, but in this case I have to.
Your argument is spurious rubbish.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by neformore
Its not very often on ATS I'll come out and say that another poster is talking complete and utter rubbish, but in this case I have to.
Your argument is spurious rubbish.
So your saying that thin aluminum with an impact area of 100s of feet would not be shredded by the hardened steel?
I can show photos of small birds putting holes in a airliner only going at takeoff speed. Imagine what the steel beams will do to the plane.
Originally posted by jfj123
Actually your post disproves your point.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Actually your post disproves your point.
No, you missed the point completly. The point is that the airliner is the fragile object. If birds can put holes in it, the the steel beams would have shredded it to pieces.
It would not have caused much damage to the steel beams of the towers.
[edit on 22-11-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by neformore
Hello?
Its not very often on ATS I'll come out and say that another poster is talking complete and utter rubbish, but in this case I have to.
We're not talking about eggs on a leading edge. We're talking about a total combined mass of 218,000lb (maybe more because that was a conservative estimate) moving at 466mph. All the parts of that airplane are moving in unison, along the same path.
Imagine - if you could - putting an egg on the front of a bullet and firing it at someone. The egg might break on impact (and to be honest even if it did there would be huge blunt trauma), but the bullet is still going to penetrate.
Your argument is spurious rubbish.
And whoever mentioned straws into tree's in hurricanes - it's not the same thing - Intense winds can bend a tree or other objects, creating cracks in which which debris (e.g., hay straw) becomes lodged before the tree straightens and the crack tightens shut again.
Originally posted by jfj123
No you missed the point.
Originally posted by thedman
What is underneath is often very massive. Not unlike our body - the skin covers bone and muscle which can do some considerable damage.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
No you missed the point.
This is what i am saying.
The aluminum airframe of the airliner is thin aluinum and would be shredded by the steel beams of the builidings and not do much damage.
[edit on 22-11-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by thedman
What is underneath is often very massive. Not unlike our body - the skin covers bone and muscle which can do some considerable damage.
Can you post information or photos of this? Because it certainly did not protect a plane from birds putting holes in it. Or a large section or wing torn off by hitting a light pole.
[edit on 22-11-2007 by ULTIMA1]
Originally posted by jfj123
If planes were really as fragile as you think, the wings would break off where they attach to the core of the plane.
Originally posted by adjay
Each tower weighed ~500,000 tons. The plane hitting it on 5 floors is roughly 5 floors divided by 110 = 4.5%. Which is approximately 22,500 tons (4.5% of 500,000). The 767 is supposed to weigh 140 tons - which is 0.6% of the mass it impacted.
Some things about this - the plane did not impact all of the 5 floors at once, and apparantly the steel at this part of the building was thinner than at lower sections, but even if you use 1/3rd of the building mass - 7500 tons - the aluminium plane was still only 1.8% of the mass of the object it impacted.
Originally posted by jfj123
Unless of course you're saying that birds are stronger then aluminum and tempered glass? Let me know if this is the case.