It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jfj123
Please show me where something official and/or scientific says that.
The thermite wouldn't have only needed to make a clean cut like the photo above, it would have also needed to cut sideways. Not an easy feat for thermite. You see, it's a powder which burns chaotically. Maybe with some device but no working device has been proven to me to work to cut a vertical column. You can direct it with a canister but that method wouldn't work to cut a column. The canister only makes a small hole. Nano-thermite has been talked about but its uses fall far short of cutting these massive columns.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Please show me where something official and/or scientific says that.
I have shown it to you. I have more but if you will not even admit to what i have already shown i doubt you will admit no matter how much evidence i show.
So please just state. Will you admit to evidence to goes against what you believe happened, YES or NO ?
Originally posted by jfj123 Again something official and/or scientific.
The two WTC towers withstood the initial impact of virtually identical aircraft (Boeing 767 200ER) during the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The robustness of the perimeter structural system and the large dimensional size of the WTC towers helped the buildings withstand the aircraft impact.
Following impact, the WTC towers displayed and withstood vibrational forces that were as much as half the levels (in extreme wind conditions) for which the buildings were designed.
Originally posted by Disclosed
reply to post by ULTIMA1
I'm curious why this thread keeps getting completely derailed. What does wind force have to do with aluminum cutting steel?
The two WTC towers withstood the initial impact of virtually identical aircraft (Boeing 767 200ER) during the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. The robustness of the perimeter structural system and the large dimensional size of the WTC towers helped the buildings withstand the aircraft impact.
Following impact, the WTC towers displayed and withstood vibrational forces that were as much as half the levels (in extreme wind conditions) for which the buildings were designed.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Disclosed
reply to post by ULTIMA1
I'm curious why this thread keeps getting completely derailed. What does wind force have to do with aluminum cutting steel?
This thread is completely derailed because ULTIMA1 is not one to acknowledge his utter defeat in the argument which is the topic of thie thread. And there we have it, -- with wind load, 707 vs 767 and all such unrelated stuff.
I suggest we let ULTIMA1 has his final word on wind load and be done with it.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
This thread is completely derailed because ULTIMA1 is not one to acknowledge his utter defeat in the argument which is the topic of thie thread.
Originally posted by jfj123
Here's the problem. The threads subject is specifically about whether or not aluminum can cut steel with regard to 9/11 plane impacts.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by jfj123
Yes, and i have posted on that subject. But i also brought up other facts and evidence of the planes impacts not causing the collapse.
Sorry if you do not like the facts and evidence i post just because they go against what you believe happened.
So when you say that you "also brought up other facts and evidence of the planes impacts not causing the collapse", you understand that is not part of the thread subject matter? Do you understand that? YES or NO?
Originally posted by jfj123
So when you say that you "also brought up other facts and evidence of the planes impacts not causing the collapse", you understand that is not part of the thread subject matter? Do you understand that? YES or NO?
Originally posted by Disclosed
They just wanted to know about aluminum cuttin thru steel...thats all.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Yes and i posted facts and evidence that the aluminum would not cause that much damage.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
If you did, you must have been writing with invisible ink, because there was nothing memorable you posted in this topic.
Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Originally posted by buddhasystem
If you did, you must have been writing with invisible ink, because there was nothing memorable you posted in this topic.
Just another sign your living in a fantasy world. Common sense and facts cannot even get through to you.