posted on Nov, 30 2012 @ 07:27 AM
reply to post by Cade
It is physically illogical for an airplane to have hit the Pentagon and it's very simple to explain why: the engines could not damage the Pentagon
like the fuselage did, so either that "plane" hit from 2 parallel universes with different laws of physics, or the official conspiracy theory is
hock wash. More and more people around the globe are discovering reality.
You weren't there.
You have never seen the physical evidence.
You don't have a structual engineering degree.
You don't have a physics degree.
So basically you are wasting key strokes on your keyboard. Just because you don't 'feel' that the plane could penatrate the walls doesn't make you
right. You have to have proof. You need to show vector calculations and material strength tables. But all you have is a gut feeling. That won't cut
it on here or in the news media or in a court of law.
Pretty much you don't have a leg to stand on.
Even if you did have calculations there's still those pesky eye witnesses.
And you last statement is totally wrong. There are not more people coming over to your side.
Once ATS cleared house this section almost died. You are one of maybe 5 people arguing the truther side of things.