Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Proof that the pentagon didn't get hit by a boeing 757

page: 22
4
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 9 2009 @ 09:11 AM
link   
The proof that the Pentagon was struck by a missile and not a plane on 9/11 lies in the SMOKE TRAIL seen in the Pentagon security videos released to Judicial Watch. Missile-deniers and other 9/11 gangsters avoid discussion of the SMOKE TRAIL like it was the plague. Watch carefully the responses to this post from such reptiles. All will try to take the discussion away from the SMOKE TRAIL. For a full analysis of the SMOKE TRAIL see www.odeion.org...

[edit on 9-3-2009 by ODEION]




posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 04:57 PM
link   
It is physically illogical for an airplane to have hit the Pentagon and it's very simple to explain why: the engines could not damage the Pentagon like the fuselage did, so either that "plane" hit from 2 parallel universes with different laws of physics, or the official conspiracy theory is hock wash. More and more people around the globe are discovering reality.



posted on Nov, 30 2012 @ 07:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Cade
 





It is physically illogical for an airplane to have hit the Pentagon and it's very simple to explain why: the engines could not damage the Pentagon like the fuselage did, so either that "plane" hit from 2 parallel universes with different laws of physics, or the official conspiracy theory is hock wash. More and more people around the globe are discovering reality.

You weren't there.
You have never seen the physical evidence.
You don't have a structual engineering degree.
You don't have a physics degree.

So basically you are wasting key strokes on your keyboard. Just because you don't 'feel' that the plane could penatrate the walls doesn't make you right. You have to have proof. You need to show vector calculations and material strength tables. But all you have is a gut feeling. That won't cut it on here or in the news media or in a court of law.
Pretty much you don't have a leg to stand on.
Even if you did have calculations there's still those pesky eye witnesses.

And you last statement is totally wrong. There are not more people coming over to your side.
Once ATS cleared house this section almost died. You are one of maybe 5 people arguing the truther side of things.





new topics
 
4
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join