Originally posted by Skyfloating
A friend of mine happened to be in New York that day as he witnessed planes fly above him right into the towers. What do you suggest that I
tell him? That he was hallucinating? That he is lying? That he was witnessing another plane but only thought that it flew into the tower?
Thanks for your input Skyfloating. A friend of mine, my sister, my friends Mom, my boss, the guy who works with me, a friend of my friend, a the guys
in the office, my brother, the guy who lives next door, the hot dog man, the pizza guy...they are all the same. They all saw a holograph.
When you see a holograph imaged with technology you don't even suspect exists, there is no fading of the edges, no transparency and no flickering,
It looks completely real. There is no difference between seeing a holograph and seeing the real thing except that the holograph is just an image like
a movie. The Doppler type sound effects are much easier than the holograph to make. The combination of both of them made for a realistic “crash”
into the World Trade Center towers.
There are several examples of aircraft debris but nothing the size of what would have been there had an actual plane crashed into the WTC. Somebody
photographed an alleged engine that allegedly flew off of Flight 175 when it allegedly hit the south tower. This alleged engine turned out to be a
CF56 which neither Flight 11 or Flight 175 had. Flight 11 had CF-6's and the airplane that allegedly hit the south tower had Pratt & Whitney's. The
exact model of which was: Engine Model: JT9D-7R4D. So however was in charge of planting evidence planted the wrong engine.
Here is an example of an alleged piece off of a Boeing 767 which pentetrated 52 steel box columns then blew up with 23,000 gallons of jet fuel and
then dropped to the street. Doesn't looked charred or burnt to me. Maybe a passport was wrapped around it:
I refer you to Morgan Reynolds Quit Am Complaint filed in New York District Court which alleges fraud against:
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORP.;
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC.;
BOEING; NuSTATS; COMPUTER AIDED ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.;
DATASOURCE, INC.; GEOSTAATS, INC.;
GILSANZ MURRAY STEFICEK LLP;
HUGHES ASSOCIATES, INC.; AJMAL ABBASI;
EDUARDO KAUSEL; DAVID PARKS;
DAVID SHARP; DANIELE VENEZANO;
JOSEF VAN DYCK; KASPAR WILLIAM;
ROLF JENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC;
ROSENWASSER/GROSSMAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, P.C.;
SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & :HEGER, INC.;
S. K. GHOSH ASSOCIATES, INC.;
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL, LLP;
TENG & ASSOCIATES, INC.;
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES, INC.;
WISS, JANNEY, ELSTNER ASSOCIATES, INC.;
AMERICAN AIRLINES; SILVERSTEIN PROPERTIES;
and UNITED AIRLINES,
I would also direct your attention to allegation 9:
9. Relator, in a Request for Correction dated March 8, 2007 (hereinafter generally referred to as March 8 RFC), copy annexed as Exhibit A,
challenged NCSTAR 1 in its entirety based on the Data Quality Act Section 515 Public Law 106-554 and based on NIST’s admitted failure to determine
what caused the destruction of WTC1,2, and further based on the submittal of proof that the actual cause was obfuscated by use of false, misleading
and fraudulent simulations seemingly showing how hollow, aluminum aircraft could impact with structural steel and nonetheless, glide right through
such steel structures (WTC1,2) from nose to end of its tail and wing to wing and leave an airplane shape, no less, all as though this event were a
cartoon much like the Roadrunner; or much like a hot knife through butter. Such simulations violate the Data Quality Act and the False Claims Act and
relator herein has so asserted.
Although the March 8 RFC is a comprehensive document detailing exactly how, in what manner and for what reasons NCSTAR 1 is fraudulent, and should
therefore be read in its entirety in conjunction with the claims of fraud made herein, it can be said that in the main, NCSTAR 1 is fraudulent because
it intentionally conceals the fact that the buildings known as the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center Complex, World Trade Center 1 and World Trade
Center 2 were not hit by Boeing 767 jetliners and all such claims to that effect are glaringly and obviously blatantly false and are indeed, a
manifested psychological operation (“psy op”) of the type that one or more of the defendants herein, including, without limitation, SAIC,
The World Trade Center Towers were not hit by Boeing 767 airplanes. It was a PsyOp.
And what should I tell the millions of other inhabitants of new york, of which many were on the streets when it happened?
I would respectfully suggest that you hold off telling them anything until you know a little bit more about what you are talking about. That’s just
That they all suffer mass-hallucination?
It was not a hallucination per se. A hallucination is “a deluded perception of a non-existent sight or sound”. The Boeing 767 existed as a
Thanks for your input it is greatly appreciated.
The holograph thread lives on!