reply to post by robert z
Ok first of all posting a reply to this may well lead people to the assumption I therefore support or believe in the hologram theory. Decide what you
Second I am simply pointing out whatever is written here by whomever is simply opinion and suggestion, there is no fact, there is no definition,
there is no proof. This is a forum and words have little to do with any real evidence proof or ability to prove facts.
I feel despite whatever the subject, be it god, atlantis, aliens, civilisations of life thriving on the moon and mars, or the conspiracies of 911,
I feel there is really no suggestions that can be described as false, dead, or otherwise completely impossible.
Because none of us really know and none of us ever will. We may think we will, but hmmm I like to keep open to all ideas.
So the first things I want to raise is
Is the building a perfect airplane cut out shape from the impact ?
Is it ?
What is a perfect airplane cut out shape? And how often do we fly planes into buildings to assess and investigate the shapes they make in the
buildings exterior ?
So there is no perfect shape and the assumption that the shape is perfect of an airplane impact is an entire assumption based on no history or
record of proveable data of airplane impacts onto buildings.
Next is the how could explosives be timed to within the millisecond?
Is this such an impossible thing? Is there nowhere in the world where timings are to the millisecond? In computer gaming sprites turn into
animations with millisecond timing. Ping and latency is determined on game servers by the millisecond. Fireworks displays and demolition, detonations
and pyrotechnics are timed to the millisecond. Movie special effects are timed to the millisecond.
Is it so impossible to suggest that an explosion cannot be timed and matched to a pre determined image reaching a pre determined point and they go
off at the exact same time?
So that in itself is not an impossibility
The real intrigue is if such a holographic technology exists and is capable, if it indeed is as advanced enough to be right before our very eyes.
Temporal and spatial ? You make it sound very complicated its not.
Its simple maths - time speed and distance.
Are you saying its impossible for me to work out how to set a firework off at the exact same time within milliseconds that object A reaches point B
given the set speed and distance to travel of object A to reach point B ?
Of course holograms did not cause damage to the building - they are holograms - they would disappear into the building. Oh wait a minute rewind
that video footage again as the plane blends into and disappears into the building and is then consumed by fire
All I am saying is none of what is said disputes or even debunks - the POSSIBILITY - sorry for caps its to emphasize the point - the possibility of
not just the holographic theory - but any theory.
Its entirely a matter of opinion not to believe or disregard an idea. But to be truly open you have to consider all of them no matter how far and
how beyond your routine logic.
I for one think 911 was entirely predetermined and planned. The fact no plane has ever been shown to what i consider evidence of a plane impact at
any of the 3 sites involved makes me think - is it possible there was just noooo planes at all.
And holographic tech exists. The question is partly what you have raised in your initial issues with the idea here - is it that good ? Can it really
be that good ?