In light of ATS' move today to recategorize "Reptilians" as Skunk Works, who would like to see the same with
NoPlanes/TVFakery/DEW's/Holograms/etc? These theories are outlandish and purley speculative, at best, while insulting and deliberate subversive
disinfo propaganda at worst. We're talking about technologies that aren't even proven to exist, nor if they did its unknown and arguably impossible
for them be able to produce the results claimed.
These rabid theories have divided and diverted
the 9/11 forum for the better part of this year. I'll remind everybody that the big yellow
WARNING bar across the top of the forums was placed there after Killtown and his crew steadily 'crashed' the forums with TV Trickery etc for weeks
on end causing an uproar that even Skeptic Overlord commeted about having spread to other forums at ATS. Now at least 6 months late rthe rage and
diversion continues, no matter how bad the theories talking points have been put down. As "Howard Beal" in "Network" said, "This is mass
NOTE: This was going to be a thread mainly about a certain video, but after posting I seen there was another thread about it and changed the post a
bit. Here's the original post...
It looks like the No Plane 'craze' has met its terror. This 'new' video should be the final nail in the coffin. As a commentor at 911Blogger said,
"No Plane / TV Trickery - RIP 2007". There's a couple others too.
In the first video of interest the cameraman was on W. Broadway, which was right in line with where the the plane debris was ejected from the opposite
side of WTC2. At around time 7:00 the impact occurs. You can hear pandemonium and loud noises as if large things are crashing down around him. Then,
as he turns back, you can see plane debris that had apparently landed and killed a pedestrian.
As we've all been covering inother recent
, other large bits of plane debris were found including a 'still
smoking' engine that landed on a street corner not too far from our above cameraman.
While I haven't done an advanced analysis on the raw source video presented above, it does seem to debunk the "MIB Flashy Thing" Theory for how
they placed the plane debris on the streets, once and for all.
In this one, at 2:30, you can see the impact of UA175:
You can even hear them saying that it looked like a United Airlines flight.
So does that make them CIA/COINTELPRO Disinfo Agents? Probably not. But perhaps "strangest" of all, they don't mention anything about missiles or
holograms or doubts about it being a plane or anything "crazy" and "outlandish" like that. Could it be possible that they in fact seen a plane?
Here's another Home Video where you can see the 2nd impact. In this clip you can't actually see the plane, but you can see the fireball from the
engine that landed on the corner of Church and Murray.
But, oh wait, they said it was a rocket or something from their far off view which caught them off guard. Inititially they didn't know what it was,
so perhaps we should take their later comments with a grain of salt? Nah! That proves there was in fact a missile?!
All sarcasm aside folks, plane debris was shot out of the building with seemingly the precise momentum as the "plane" entered the other side. This
debris landed in the streets. People likely died from it. REAL human beings.
We don't even know the full extent of how much debris landed
outside the buildngs.
Perhaps most importantly, there are no known photos or videos showing the ground on the sides where the planes entered. A key argument being
parroted is a complaint that the planes entire shapes didn't penetrate all points of contact in the 'cartoon' holes, and that debris wasn't found.
YET THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT DEBRIS WASN'T FOUND.
It goes on and on. The NoPlane / DEW / TVFakery / Hologram / SpaceBeams / etc purely speculative paradigm is an insult to the people who
died, and to the 9/11 Truth Movement. I'd vote to have it placed the Skunk Works forum -where it belongs- any day.
[edit on 7-10-2007 by IgnoranceIsntBlisss]