It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Tower Birds

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 12:38 PM
link   
The Tower Birds

Bird? kind of big don't you think?
www.rengel.net...
www.rengel.net...
www.rengel.net...

From here:
www.chemtrailcentral.com...
by mr. jones

Willing to discuss any photo... just link me to your thread.

You know of course there will be an EM light disturbance Tesla theory source.
Of course.




posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 12:45 PM
link   
Considering the World Trade Center in that image would be blocks away, and the birds seem to be much nearer to the photgrapher, it would be my guess that they appear to be that large simply because the bird is closer to the photographer than the actual building.



posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 12:48 PM
link   
What's the point of this thread? Pics of the towers with birds in them. Am I missing something here?



posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 01:37 PM
link   
Did I say birds, perhaps some UFO poped by to observe the towers.
Pigeons, yes but birds, no.
Bird like a plane but its not a plane.

I see an Alien face... a typical form of the triangle craft.

You see no shape, only the bright and black lightning areas around
the UFO due to the high electric field flying mechanism.



posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 02:30 PM
link   
Actually those are cloaking flying device. There is a video with the best evidence (at least for me) that weird craft were used during the 911 attack.
Here is the thread I started a while back.
Since than I examined the Video in great details and I can count 6 of those devices.
Please note the pixelation of the buildings it will help you understand where they are placed.
Please also note the size of them before they depart.
You will need a big screen to notice every detail.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 02:34 PM
link   
Weird the video was removed from you tube
sorry mate



posted on Oct, 7 2007 @ 11:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by piacenza
Weird the video was removed from you tube
sorry mate


Wonder how that happened because there is an online 9/11 video archive
that 9/11 theme posters use.

The page I referenced has moving gifs on the Tower UFOs.


Among other assorted photographic anomalies.



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 11:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by sensfan
What\'s the point of this thread? Pics of the towers with birds in them. Am I missing something here?


Yes, you are missing something -an understanding of how deeply some people will delude themselves into wanting to see evidence that will support their beliefs.

It would go against every fiber of some people\'s existence to admit that arab terrorists committed the abhorrent crimes of 9/11 out of a misplaced religious/socialist-based agenda. Therefore, some people will imagine that what are clearly birds are actually mini-UFOs with cloaking devices projecting images of commercial airliners hitting the WTCs.



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 03:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by robert z
Yes, you are missing something -an understanding of how deeply some people will delude themselves into wanting to see evidence that will support their beliefs.


Sounds like the poeple that still believe the official story that cannot provide any evidence to support the official story.

They will say or do anything to keep from admitting the official story could be wrong, that would ruin their perfect media fed fantasy world they live in.



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 04:59 PM
link   
Its don't fight the official story.
The Times They Are A Changing NOT.
Kids today going into college say there were no core beams in the WTC.

You know they are right and the propaganda is right... the core beams
were blown out by thermate, thats why no beams is the truth and
our elite leaders tell no lies.

Since 2001 the school text books are the mind control of the masses.
Rots of Ruck Conspiracy Theory.. you can't win.

If you don't know how a UFO works then don't call it a bird or lens dust.
The Occult propulsion system is now known to a few.


[edit on 10/8/2007 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1
Sounds like the poeple that still believe the official story that cannot provide any evidence to support the official story.

They will say or do anything to keep from admitting the official story could be wrong, that would ruin their perfect media fed fantasy world they live in.


So saying that a few birds in a video are actually cloaked flying devices that somehow were used to project holograms of planes because there were no claims is not living in a fantasy world?

Please my friend, give your head a shake. Perhaps you are one that will say or do anything to keep from admitting the official story could be RIGHT ?



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 05:46 PM
link   
They are birds between 15-20 feet from the camera. What is this thread insinuating exactly?



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 05:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by robert z

Sounds like the poeple that still believe the official story that cannot provide any evidence to support the official story.

They will say or do anything to keep from admitting the official story could be wrong, that would ruin their perfect media fed fantasy world they live in.


There is a wide continuum to the individual components of the official store. The certifiably loony claim that no part of the official story is true, including the fact that planes hit the buildings. This spectrum narrows down all the way to those who think the U.S. intelligence let it happen.

Nowhere in the realm of rational thinking is there even a minutia of evidence that UFOs that look like birds are in fact cloaking devices for holographic projectors. Failing to call this type of nonsense what it is -total and utter b.s., only adds to the perception that 9/11 truthers are nut cases.



posted on Oct, 8 2007 @ 06:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by sensfan
So saying that a few birds in a video are actually cloaked flying devices that somehow were used to project holograms of planes because there were no claims is not living in a fantasy world?


I never said anything about birds.

I am just stating that i do not know 1 person that believes the official story that has actually done any real research to find out what happened that day.

I have filed FOIA to the FBI and NTSB

I have e-mailed companies that were actually at ground zero.

What research have you done to prove the official story is right ?



posted on Oct, 9 2007 @ 03:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by robert z
Yes, you are missing something -an understanding of how deeply some people will delude themselves into wanting to see evidence that will support their beliefs.


Sounds like the poeple that still believe the official story that cannot provide any evidence to support the official story.

They will say or do anything to keep from admitting the official story could be wrong, that would ruin their perfect media fed fantasy world they live in.


And you still sound like one of the individuals who claims a million different theories and refused to put up any information backing your claims. I think the fantasy world you refer to is yours and yours alone.

AGAIN I ASK....What evidence do you have that Planes DID NOT hit the towers??? Show me official documentation saying it was a holograph, a missle or anything....



posted on Oct, 10 2007 @ 12:14 AM
link   
This page on Tesla.
www.pbs.org...
The bottom right photo.


Tesla experimented with many coil shapes. Here a conical coil, demonstrated in his lab in 1895, is "specially adapted to excite the electrical charge of the earth." The streamers at the top of the coil are of purple hue and several feet in diameter. Tension is about one million volts.


A purple oval cloud above the MV coil.

If that bird that looks like an alien mask, did you notice that, is a Tesla
flying craft of a multiple arrangement of flat coil motors, the black or
white circles are due to forward and reverse lightning.

About 9/11, no one believes the official story, whatever it says...
think the opposite.

cw034:
How can you bash 9/11 truth... are you some official?

What do you think about the Tesla theories or truth for UFOs?

thewebfairy.com...
Another 9/11 thing...

www.chemtrailcentral.com...

Plenty of birds and unknown planes on that page.. they disappear and
mend the south tower and come out the other side...
take a look, .. unless I got the wrong page.

ED: its the official truth that can't stand up to exposure and avoid and
cover up airline passenger lists and can't verify a hijack or planes
crashes were the same as the airliners of the official story.
The official story is full of holes.




[edit on 10/10/2007 by TeslaandLyne]



posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 02:20 PM
link   
Checking out the original photos, forget the bids.

Even though they covered something else.

I see the intact corner of the South Tower where the plane came out.

I see a line of fire but no big hole, like the plane squished down and
slid along the floor and came out the windows.



posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 04:51 PM
link   
Sorry to say that looking at what pictures are left in the linked thread (Some have expired) I have to agree with others that most if not all the crafts are birds. Some of the cigar shaped things may also be some form of lens flare that can accur when taking picture of lit objects at night. Its a common problem when taking images of night time skylines.
As for the Orbs, these 'may' be specs of dust that have been illuminated but a flash etc. Again can be a common problem when taking shots at night and where the equipment is'nt clean, made worse by use of an external, hotshoe mounted flash gun.

NOTE for clarification. I am and have been a professional photography for almost 15 years, I have taken 1000's of images at night in varying light conditions and have seen most if not all the effects seen here. I am not 'Debunking' anything or anyone, I am merely giving you my professional photographic point of view.

Please dont jump on me with name calling or 'doubter' comments please. This is just my professional opinion. I am a firm believer in Alien life, UFO's etc but I am pretty sure that these images show none of the above.

[edit on 13-9-2008 by StarTraveller]



posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 05:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by cw034
AGAIN I ASK....What evidence do you have that Planes DID NOT hit the towers???

Please, show me one piece of evidence that proves Flights AA11 and UA175 hit the towers.

I don't want hearsay and I don't want DNA, none of that proves the identity of the alleged planes.



posted on Sep, 13 2008 @ 06:08 PM
link   
reply to post by tezzajw
 


Airplanes hit the towers. You care to share with the rest of us what you think if anything) hit them?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join