The Battle Between Good and Evil... (Who's winning?), page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 27-9-2007 @ 10:35 AM by EJHoover
The Hitler question is a good one and my first reaction would be to kill. If I consider it a bit harder though, why should I 'lower myself' to kill this person when he has a life time of desicions to make in front of him to lead him to the point where he did all the things he did.

Firstly, if I don't kill him, knowing what i know, does that make me as guilty as him for not killing someone and breaking the same laws (albeit on a different scale)?

Secondly, we all know the terrible things that Hitler was responsible for but do we ever hear of the good things he may have done? I am sure he must have done something in his whole life that would be seen as genuinely 'good' - so would I also be wrong if I killed him for stopping that?

The answers to both of these questions assume that there is a 'scale' to goodness / badness. If the question was 'kill the guy who dinged my car in the car park' it would not have the same meaning but can we really put a scale on this?

I think our inability to put a scale on it means that we cannot say whether 'good' or 'bad' is winning. People are people, none of us are perfect but we are not inherently evil. We make decisions as we go through life, some 'good' and some 'bad' but we make them on the basis of our own internal moral code. When our moral code coincides with those around us, then it is 'good', often when it doesn't it is 'bad' (even if by others standards it could be good)

[edit on 27-9-2007 by EJHoover]

[edit on 27-9-2007 by EJHoover]


reply posted on 28-9-2007 @ 12:30 AM by justanothergangster
it depends on your own personal logic take for example a mans arrested for selling drugs the prosecution crucifies him saying hes been to jail before hes a burden on society ok now lets say the first time he sold drugs and got arrested he was a kid and was just trying to eat because his parents werent always there for him (alchoholics drug addicts what have you) and now that hes older even though this looks horrible to a jury what if he was selling drugs cause noone would hire him cause every time they do a background check they see hes a criminal but hes got kids to feed so what does he do he turns back to selling drugs but what other alternative does he have? let his kids starve?...let the state take his kids away from him where he wont be able to see them again? its like the problem i have with wars a neighbourhoods controlled by gangs so one day a man loses his cool and shoots one of them because hes tired of thier influence on his children or them always breaking into his house or always spraying tags on his back fence or all three...he goes to jail and is convicted of murder then on the other hand a man under orders from his country murders 15 20 people and is given a medal....i think there is no right or wrong just a legacy that people will judge you by when youre gone you either led d to a positive outcome regardless of your actions or a negative one regardless of your actions....one more example the iraq war a man decides to serve and die for his country which is very honorable and would be considered good but he leaves a country that is now torn by war and civil strife....sometimes you can do as many good things as you want but things will still be regarded as bad and sometimes you can do stuff that is bad but your ultimate outcome was for good....idonno and as far as whos winning look around youll see its obvious why is the top grossing movies always someone getting shot or shooting others why are the best selling video games where you have to kill people idonno what im trying to say exactly but thats the thoughts that came to me when i read this


reply posted on 28-9-2007 @ 01:02 AM by Conundrum04
reply to post by justanothergangster




The powers that be may have you by the balls right now(i.e. "the matrix has you").

Your examples are thoughtful but you're thinking on a micro level(individual/reactionist level). The people in power want that type of confusion that you just posted. They want their minions to squabble and kill over mundane bs, just as long as you don't catch on to their illegal actions.

If a dad of 3 is desparate, hungry and unemployed who needs to feed their family decides to rob a liquor store, this is exactly what the elite expect. As long as you rob and steal from the common man and don't interfer with their ambitions, goals, and "evil" undertakings. It's all good. Just send the loser to Folsom prison and throw away the key.

You have to be able to see things on a macro level(the big picture).

You have to self educate yourself to understand that your actions are directly related to the actions of your leaders.





[edit on 28-9-2007 by Conundrum04]


reply posted on 28-9-2007 @ 01:53 AM by Redge777
Originally posted by TheSecretTruth
If you were around at the time of Hitler's birth, and you had the option of killing him or letting him live, what would you do?
[edit on 27-9-2007 by TheSecretTruth]

I would pray for him, cast out the demon of darkness and make him a warrior of light, instead of the incarnate evil he became. It is unfortunate the person God called for this exact mission decided to go have a cup of coffee with friends instead...

The bible does say the saints will be losing the battle when Jesus returns. Since the bible was mentioned I thought I would source this

Revelation 13:4they worshiped the dragon because he gave his authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, "Who is like the beast, and who is able to wage war with him?"

5There was given to him a mouth speaking arrogant words and blasphemies, and authority to act for forty-two months was given to him.

6And he opened his mouth in blasphemies against God, to blaspheme His name and His tabernacle, that is, those who dwell in heaven.

7It was also given to him to make war with the saints and to overcome them, and authority over every tribe and people and tongue and nation was given to him.

8All who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain.

9If anyone has an ear, let him hear.

...

Revelations 1821Then a strong angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea, saying, "So will Babylon, the great city, be thrown down with violence, and will not be found any longer.

22"And the sound of harpists and musicians and flute-players and trumpeters will not be heard in you any longer; and no craftsman of any craft will be found in you any longer; and the sound of a mill will not be heard in you any longer;

23and the light of a lamp will not shine in you any longer; and the voice of the bridegroom and bride will not be heard in you any longer; for your merchants were the great men of the earth, because all the nations were deceived by your sorcery.

24"And in her was found the blood of prophets and of saints and of (BN)all who have been slain on the earth."

God Bless


[edit on 28-9-2007 by Redge777]
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



New Testament Fairy Tales
  Posted 7 days ago with 25 member flags
A Brief Rant On Religion
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Obama has declared himself the messiah?
  Posted 3 days ago with 13 member flags