posted on Sep, 26 2007 @ 02:05 PM
That documentary is originally had me thinking the same, and I still think it was a complete psy-op, but most, if not all of the specific claims
made in that documentary are wrong or irrelevant. I remember one of the first problems I realized is that they assumed a head-on impact at the
Pentagon when the "official story" holds that the plane hit at about a 45 degree angle. I know all of this is still disputed but for media
professionals the reporting is sloppy. There was no explosion in WTC6 before the collapses that sent a massive dust cloud in the air, either, but
that was the dust cloud from WTC2 collapsing. Little things like that discredit it, and I think it may have even been intentional on some level (ie
someone involved with it must have known better about at least some of the bull they were baldly asserting).
Have you seen 9/11 Mysteries? It's loaded with information compared to In Plane Sight. There are some talks/lectures posted online of physicist Dr.
Steven Jones and mechanical engineer Gordon Ross too that go into pretty deep detail on the nature of the WTC collapses, and those are probably the
most accurate and rock-solid videos you could watch to educate yourself as to what exactly took place that day. An old member here with the username
"Christophera" has an interesting presentation on YouTube/Google too.