posted on Jan, 18 2004 @ 11:21 AM
Believe it or not, the following are facts about the moon: it is either hollow, or made of something considerably less dense than rock. (Cheese
Studies and calculations, based on mass, centers of gravity and composition have led many scientists to come to the startling conclusion that the moon
is about half the density that it sould be. As well, the moon rings like a hollow bell when struck.
Seismometers were set up on the moon's surface by the astronauts of Apollo XII. When the Lunar module had taken off, heading back to earth, the
astronauts discarded the ascent stage of the lunar module, dropping it on the moons surface, smashing the craft and creating a tremor that was picked
up by the seismometers. When the NASA scientists heard the data stream, they couldn’t believe what they were hearing: the moon was ringing like a bell
and continued to do so for around an hour, the creshendo of which was about six minutes after the impact- exactly the same resonant behaviour (albeit
many hundreds of thoudands of times larger) as a spherical bell.
After they had had a chance to analyse the seismological information, NASA declared (to themselves) that the moon seemed to be a hollow sphere with a
uniform, solid metallic layer around 34-40 miles below the surface.
Next is the fact that the densest metallic rocks, which are usually found molten at the cores of planets and large moons, was spread across the
surface in the form of marias, or seas, the dark patches visible on the surface of the moon. The official line on this is that they are cooled lava
seas from an earlier, volcanically active period in the Moon's history. But there is so much lava that the volcanos must have excreted the
planetlet's entire molten core, leaving it, yes, that's right, hollow! No natural process is known to be able to do this, so I am suggesting to you
that this was done by some ancient civilisation, many billions of years ago.
There are other mysteries surrounding our moon: The fact that the same side ALWAYS faces us, with absolutely no variation whatsoever. The official
story from NASA is that the moon 'budded' off from the earth creating this effect, despite the fact that, again, no known natural process is able to
explain this, and the fact that the composition of the moon is entirely different to that of earth. If you look at the artificial hypothesis, one can
see that this would have practical implications. If one side always faced the earth, then it would maximise the efficiancy of ferrying between the
moon and our planet. As well, anamalous images by orbiters of structures on the surface, NASA sensored conversations between crews of apollo missions,
and the whole 'faked landing to conceal truth' theory add to the evidence.
My conclusions, and one which is shared by many others, are that the moon was a small planet hollowed out in some other star system by an advanced
civilisation, then somehow piloted here as an 'Ark'. Arriving at the earth, the population living inside, which could have numbered millions, left
their world, and colonised ours. There is evidence of such a colonisation, in ancient texts, the moon is described as arriving, and there are times
described before the moon's arrivial. This can be coupled with the ancient astronaut theory, which suggests that alien intelligences spawned
civilisation here on earth many thousands of years ago, but that their own civilisation was destroyed by some massive disaster on earth, a sad end to
a monumental adventure across space.
Read the first chapter of Jim Marrs's Alien Agena for more info.