Questionaire[/url]I know there are a lot of people here at ATS who are not religious and well i would like to talk to you.
My sister has a friend who is doing her fourth year of Psychology. She has a thesis and needs to get 100 surveys in for Understanding Spiritual
Experiences. It's worth 80% of her marks for the entire year and will impact her life further in the field of psychology. She currently has about
22... And she needs to have 100 by nexy Monday 10th of September 2007, Australia time. Thats Sunday 9th September, for you Americans ;-P
Pretty much is what i'm asking is if anyone here would like to fill out a survey to help psychologists Understand Spiritual Experiences.
So i created a web page about it
Understanding Spiritual Experiences
All you need to do is fill out a questionaire and send it to her via email with your full name as the subject line (which means you give consent for
them to use your experiences for this psychology study).
Here's a link to the Questionaire:
Questionaire
HEre's a link to the Consent Form for reading:
Consent Form
Here's a link to the Info Letter:
Info Letter
So anyways, whether you will in the questionaire (which i hope you do), or not, i'd still like to know what sort of spiritual experiences you have
had if you want ;-P
Anyways mine is below (i'd really like to hear some feedback, and perhaps your own spiritual experiences/thoughts?):
Please describe any experience that may have touched you spiritual, mentioning as many details of this experience as you can.
I was reading a scientific experiment where the results of a REG (Random Event Generator) became not so random. Pretty much what this REG does is
create two states. Either a yes or a no. A 1 or a 0. One or the other. Randomly. The few million results get recorded to show that it is random and
acting randomly. Add a human being consciously thinking and wanting the REG to change from being random to being more towards one state, such as a yes
instead of a no, or a 1 instead of a 0. And these “random events” are not so random anymore. They lean more to the side the person is consciously
thinking of. By pure conscious will a random event has been changed. What it means is that conscious thought can actually have an effect on physical
reality (even if its just a little). To change physical reality by pure thought alone. I found it to be astounding. It’s like trying by pure thought
to will a gold nugget into existence into the palm of your hand. It lead me to doing some research on what we know to be reality, which lead me on to
quantum physics. It pretty much tells you what we consider physical reality really isn’t physical at all. When you get down to the smallest bits of
what is considered matter (ie, electrons, quarks), you really find out that so called matter is really popping in and out of existence all the time.
They can be here and there, or this and that all at the same time. They can exist in one state, and exist in another state at the same time. If you
were to shoot an electron (a so called tiny piece of matter) out of a gun at a piece of paper that has two slits down it, you will find that that one
single electron will somehow go through both slits, interfere with itself, as it is in a wave of possible locations all at the same time. It’s a big
load of possibilities (if there weren’t these possibilities the sun literally wouldn’t shine). But if you were to try to measure which slit that
one single electron goes through, it would only end up going through one, not both. Scientists have worked out that if I were to push on a wall,
eventually I would push through that physical wall and appear on the other side, and the wall would still be there (The odds are that I’d have to
wait around for pretty much eternity though). I’d pretty much pop out of existence and appear on the other side. It’s a possibility albeit a very
small one. Then there’s entanglement. If you make two electrons at the same time, they are entangled, connected, do something to one of them, the
other one reacts instantly (even if it were to be on the other side of the universe, it would be instant). Either information is moving infinitely
fast, or the two electrons are still connected, they are entangled, and since everything was entangled at the moment of the big bang, that means that
everything is still touching. Space is just the construct that gives the illusion that there are separate objects. Then you get into string theory
which tells you that the smallest objects we have ever seen are made up of little vibrating strings of energy a few billion times smaller than what
we can physically see through powerful electron microscopes. When it comes down to the mathematics of it, these little strings of energy MUST exist in
Eleven dimensions. Now when you start having a look at dimensions and get up the dimensional ladder, ie. We are in the 3rd dimension, the 4th
dimension adds time, etc. Well when you get up to the 10th dimension, What it includes is pretty much everything. Access to all the possible
timelines, in all the possible universes, parallel or not parallel, that are the same as ours, or governed by different rules than ours, since the
inception of the big bang (or by something completely different). If the smallest parts that make up everything in the universe, exist in eleven
dimensions, which is to say everything, every possible time, every possible universe, ever, and we are made up of this stuff, and everything in the
universe is, it feels to me that everything is connected. It seems crazy, but this is high notch science. Oh, and scientists have worked out that
people CAN see the future (even if it’s just on the subconscious level) ;-P (So I guess Question 7. I seem to have a ‘sixth sense’ that
sometimes allows me to know what is going to happen.) could be considered true....
------------------
So any help would be appreciated. Any views and comments would be too.
Anyways. Plesae fill out the questionaire and send it to her.
I'll try and get you results of the thesis / study if i can. I am truely interested what the results will be. Anyways. Thank you
[edit on 2-9-2007 by DaRAGE]
[edit on 2-9-2007 by DaRAGE]
[edit on 2-9-2007 by DaRAGE]
[edit on 2-9-2007 by DaRAGE]
[edit on 2-9-2007 by DaRAGE]