Dems subpoena Rove, page 1

This topic is in the Breaking Political News discussion forum. (rss)

Dems subpoena Rove

Topic started on 26-7-2007 @ 10:50 PM by aecreate
Dems subpoena Rove firstread.msnbc.msn.com Congressional Democrats subpoenaed White House senior adviser Karl Rove, and Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) charged that “political considerations factored into the unprecedented firing of at least nine United States Attorneys last year," the AP reports. “E-mails released by the Justice Department show [Attorney General Alberto] Gonzales’ aides conferred with Rove” on the firing of the prosecutors, the AP reports. (visit the link for the full news article) Related News Links: www.reuters.com www.allheadlinenews.com rawstory.com
copyright & usage
Click here for more Breaking Political News topics Hot Topics \| Top Topics \| This Week \| Subscribe \| Home
reply posted on 26-7-2007 @ 10:50 PM by aecreate
Will the Sith Lord comply with the subpoena? I thought the following was humorous enough to include: White House counsel Fred Fielding said Rove wouldn’t be showing up because “the subpoena probably got delivered to the wrong address” and that Leahy “couldn’t prove he was a senator” and “the font was kind of weird looking, like something from an IBM Selectric” and “Rove is home sick this year” and “La la la la I can’t hear you.” source In addition to Rove, J. Scott Jennings, the Deputy Director of Political Affairs, was also ordered to provide testimony and documents. Leahy has given them till Aug. 2nd. The subpoena-party continues.. firstread.msnbc.msn.com (visit the link for the full news article)
copyright & usage

reply posted on 27-7-2007 @ 05:17 PM by RRconservative
Fired U.S. Attorneys in the last 15 years... Clinton 93 Bush 8 Why are Bush's firing so much more heinous than Clinton's??? Democrat Politics?
copyright & usage

reply posted on 27-7-2007 @ 05:32 PM by intrepid
Originally posted by RRconservative Fired U.S. Attorneys in the last 15 years... Clinton 93 Bush 8 Why are Bush's firing so much more heinous than Clinton's??? Democrat Politics? Why are you jacking a thread with stuff from a previous administration instead of discussing a current topic? Republican politics? Obfuscate and dismiss? Nice.
copyright & usage
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
reply posted on 27-7-2007 @ 05:52 PM by RRconservative
Originally posted by intrepid Why are you jacking a thread with stuff from a previous administration instead of discussing a current topic? Republican politics? Obfuscate and dismiss? Nice. People need to know the truth! Does it not bother you that Clinton fired over 11 times the number of attorneys than Bush? If U.S. Attorneys serve at the will of the President, and firing them is totally legal. Why is this such an issue? Senator Diane Fienstein complained about one of the fired attorneys. Why isn't she being called to testify on why she thought one was doing a bad job? Here is the new Democrat slogan... Subpoena, Surrender, and Censor!
copyright & usage

reply posted on 27-7-2007 @ 05:58 PM by intrepid
Originally posted by RRconservative Does it not bother you that Clinton fired over 11 times the number of attorneys than Bush? I honestly don't care. It's NOT the topic. Here is the new Democrat slogan... Subpoena, Surrender, and Censor! SWEET. Your partisan crap is noted. NOW would you like to discuss the topic?
copyright & usage