It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
This is utter ignorance!...
...You claim that any building can't collapse into its own footprint...
Anok, you cliamed you said there was steel left on the windsor building. I was only asking that you point it any above the 17th floor.
I will not post anymore photos of the gash....
Don't spin my words or accuse my of being biased...
What witnesses have I dismissed? If I have.. please point them out so that I may explain why.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
The timing appears to be off on the amount of time it took to fall. We are all shown the same 10 second video over and over.... this video shows all 4 corners did not fail at the same time. Watch the video and it will point out how the collapse started WELL before most CT sites show.
infinityoreilly and others think a comparison to the Murrah Building is a good comparison.
What was the Murrah building constructed with?
What was WTC-7 maily constructed with?
What was NEW-WTC-7 RE built with?
If you know the answers to these questions, you will clearly see that there is NO comparison between the buildings, their construction, or they way they were destroyed.
I won't get into the other false claims that are made about WTC7 because this is a thread that is dealing with "dust". Wit hrespect to Anok, I will not derail this. I just want those that are interested in the TRUTH.... the videos I posted clearly show:
1- Intense fires
2- Intense smoke
3- A much longer than free fall collapse
4- Some of the severe damage that WTC7 received from the collapse of the North Tower.
Look up some posts of mine at this forum about the fire boats that were speeding in to help with a LOT of pumping power and hose lines.
Strangely, these lines were aimed at lost buildings, WTC 5 and 6, heavily damaged already and with raging fires pouring out all sides, with definitely no inhabitants at all, they were evacuated before both WTC 1 and 2 collapses
Originally posted by infinityoreilly
I have issues with your timeline for the collapse. After the left side of the penthouse goes down I started counting and I get to 9 or 10 seconds by the time WTC7 dissapears from view.
Originally posted by infinityoreilly
This seems incredible to me when your talking noncontroled collapse. There should be a irregular hurky jerky sideways 20 to 30 second collapse not what the video shows.
Originally posted by infinityoreilly
Decent post by the way
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Then they say they fell cause of Fire.... ahhh ya.... OK THEN!!!!
Originally posted by ANOK
One simple word smart-ass RESISTANCE...As well as another half dozen laws of physics.
Originally posted by ANOK
I don't understand what the point of your argument is here. Because the building partially collapsed above the 17th floor, it proves WTC 7 could globally collapse in it's own footprint. What twisted logic.
Originally posted by ANOK
And how can you say only the concrete remained standing? I can see lots of steel still intact after being engulfed for 24 hours or so.
Originally posted by ANOK
So you admit you have NO idea how much damage the building sustained, yet you want us to believe it's this unknown damage that caused WTC 7 to globally fail and fall into it's own footprint? How are coming to your conclusions? Again twisted logic.
Originally posted by ANOKI didn't spin your words, you dismissed them as 'foreigners', your words. That my friend however you look at it is bias.
They are experts, and just like the rest of us can tell just by looking at how the building fell that it had to be a controlled demolition. You obviously are either lying through your teeth, or you are really ignorant when it comes to physics. I don't need witnesses to tell me what I can see with my own eyes.
Originally posted by ANOKWhat research have you done? All you bring here is the same old tired crap fed to you by your lying government.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Actually if you look at the timer in the lower left hand corner it shows you the time. As I posted previously on this thread: @ 5:08 the left side of the penthouse collapses. @ 11:28 the rest of the penthouse starts to collapse so...that is 6.20 seconds until the remainder of the collapse commences. At approx 18:00 of the counter, you lose visual of the building. 18:00 - 11:28 = 7.72 seconds. This comes out to about 13.92 seconds of the total collapse sequence.
( irealize this isn't the same way I posted the time in my previous post)
According to Captain Michael Currid, the sergeant at arms for the Uniformed Fire Officers Association, some time after the collapse of the North Tower, he sees four or five fire companies trying to extinguish fires in Building 7 of the WTC. Someone from the city̵7;s Office of Emergency Management tells him that WTC 7 is in serious danger of collapse. Currid says, “The consensus was that it was basically a lost cause and we should not lose anyone else trying to save it.” Along with some others, he goes inside WTC 7 and yells up the stairwells to the fire fighters, “Drop everything and get out!” [Murphy, 2002, pp. 175-176] However, other accounts contradict this, claiming that no attempt is made to fight the fires in WTC 7 (see (11:30 a.m.) September 11, 2001). One report later claims, “Given the limited water supply and the first strategic priority, which was to search for survivors in the rubble, FDNY did not fight the fires [in WTC 7].” [Fire Engineering, 9/2002] And a 2002 government report says, “the firefighters made the decision fairly early on not to attempt to fight the fires, due in part to the damage to WTC 7 from the collapsing towers.” [Federal Emergency Management Agency, 5/1/2002, pp. 5-21] Building 7 eventually collapses late in the afternoon of 9/11 (see (5:20 p.m.) September 11, 2001).
www.cooperativeresearch.org...
Originally posted by earth2
Ill tell you why im not interested, because you have one point of view instead of an open mind.
Im just as curious as you are on the 9/11 attacks however a lot of the things you argue lacks 100% proof. So maybe you are wrong on a few things but you will never figure it out because you are so set in your ways.
Actually I would love to debate 9/11 but its guys like you trying to ram your ideas into me that makes it difficult.
[edit on 25-7-2007 by earth2]
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Then they say they fell cause of Fire.... ahhh ya.... OK THEN!!!!
Who is "they?" Can you give me a source for "them." I would hope that "they" realized 40 stories of a falling skyscraper was raining debris on top of it.
Cooperative research is a good site, but I advised to get your info from the NIST reports.