It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you allow it to burn long enough, the fire will cook the steel.
I'm not denying there were fires, just not to the extent some people want to believe. There has been an ongoing argument over whether the smoke in the pic I posted was from WTC 7 or not. With this series of pics I posted it's pretty obvious it was dust from the collapse of WTC 1
Originally posted by gottago
^CO
First off, why don't you post videos of the Madrid fire, or the one on Philly, or any of the numerous fires that have raged uncontrolled through other modern steel-framed skyscrapers in comparison to WTC7?
Originally posted by gottagoLots of smoke, I'll grant you, as in smoke screen.
Originally posted by gottagoAnd I frankly laughed when I watched the video stretching out the collapse to 13+ seconds. First off, nothing but nothing happens in the first five seconds before the penthouse collapses.
Originally posted by gottagoSecondly, why would the penthouse initiate collapse?
Originally posted by thedman
To do this required cantilever truss spanning the station,
Originally posted by thedman
in addition the vertical support columns were under great stress.
Originally posted by thedman
Loss of even 1 or 2 columns would compromise stability of building.
Originally posted by thedman
This was before the fires began to weaken the structure even more.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Are there any videos? Here are some pictures, and in fact The Madrid fire suffered a partial collapse....all the steel did indeed fail at the upper floors and collapse ..all that was standing was the concrete.
Originally posted by gottago
And I frankly laughed when I watched the video stretching out the collapse to 13+ seconds. First off, nothing but nothing happens in the first five seconds before the penthouse collapses.
Collapse 3, Building 7
18 seconds
17:20:33�1 0.6
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
...they actually do have preliminary statements (that could change) that say that the building collapse progressed from the penthouse out as columns were weakened by the fires.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Again with the seismic records records show :
Collapse 3, Building 7
18 seconds
17:20:33�1 0.6
www.firehouse.com...
Originally posted by Pootie
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
The Madrid fire suffered a partial collapse....all the steel did indeed fail at the upper floors and collapse
wrong.
Look at the floors below the collapsed part... all of the structural steel is still there.
Notice how the Madrid fire showed signs of a heat induced collapse and the WTC did not?
Slow onset.
Asymmetrical.
Not progressive.
Long burn time.
Far bigger fire.
Far more fire damage.
No sprinklers as far as I have found (unlike the WTC towers that had giant tanks ABOVE the impact zones)
www.concretecentre.com...
The only part of the building to collapse was the network of steel perimeter columns supporting the slab on the upper floors.
Construction Type: Reinforced concrete core with waffle slabs supported by internal RC columns and steel beams, with perimeter steel
Originally posted by Pootie
LOL... and you know this HOW? That building was designed to lose 1/4-1/2 of ALL OF THE COLUMNS and remain standing. Google "safety factor". You are posting WRONG information.
In that building, there was literally one column left in that whole building.
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
The Madrid tower lost portions of its steel frame from the fire. Windsor's central core was steel reinforced concrete.
Originally posted by Pootie
Way to ignore all of this:
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Originally posted by gottago
First off, why don't you post videos of the Madrid fire, or the one on Philly, or any of the numerous fires that have raged uncontrolled through other modern steel-framed skyscrapers in comparison to WTC7?
Please show me in these skyscapers that you are refering to, one or more of the following:
1. An airplane smashing into it at 500 mph
2. Or a 110 foot skyscraper showering debris into it as it collapsed
Are there any videos? Here are some pictures, and in fact The Madrid fire suffered a partial collapse....all the steel did indeed fail at the upper floors and collapse ..all that was standing was the concrete.
Originally posted by gottagoLots of smoke, I'll grant you, as in smoke screen.
Ahh... Brilliant!
Originally posted by gottagoAnd I frankly laughed when I watched the video stretching out the collapse to 13+ seconds. First off, nothing but nothing happens in the first five seconds before the penthouse collapses.
Then you didn't watch it. Thats the problem .. you can clearly see the collaspe at the top left section of the Penthouse.
Originally posted by gottagoSecondly, why would the penthouse initiate collapse?
Did I say that? I can't explain exactly why it collapsed...neither has NIST. All I know is that there is ZERO evidence that supports a CD. DO you happen to have any witnesses to hearing bombs go off just prior to the initial collapse? Are you in possesion that shows seismic records that have been verified by a geologist or seismologist that proves there were explosions just before the collapse?
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Slow onset. WTC7 = 6 hours Madrid= 2 1/2 hours
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Partial. WTC= Steel Structure Madrid = Steel & Concrete
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Asymmetrical WTC= all the steel collapsed MAdrid= all the steel collapsed
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Not progressive... I didn't see the actual collapse.. let me get back to this one
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Long burn time. Indeed
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Far bigger fire. "Bigger Fire" But not as destructive since WTC7 was Steel
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
We are discussing WTC7 i assumed... can you tell me what type of sprinkler system was in WTC7? I am not aware of that.
The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. [Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.
First off, why don't you post videos of the Madrid fire, or the one on Philly, or any of the numerous fires that have raged uncontrolled through other modern steel-framed skyscrapers in comparison to WTC7?
Originally posted by CaptainObvious
Gotta Go...
i Posted the pictures of the collaspe for you.... Um .... I guess I have to draw a red line around them...
Originally posted by thedman
WTC7 (New York) - severe structural damage prior to fire, fire burn for
7 hours
result - total structural collapse