Clinton, Edwards talk of limiting debate, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times
Topic started on 13-7-2007 @ 10:59 AM by Togetic

Clinton, Edwards talk of limiting debate


www.wluctv6.com
Democrats John Edwards and Hillary Rodham Clinton consider themselves among the top presidential candidates.

...

Edwards says, "We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group."

Clinton agrees, saying, "We've got to cut the number" and "they're not serious." She also says that she thought their campaigns had already tried to limit the debates and say, "We've gotta get back to it."
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
abcnews.go.com
news.yahoo.com


reply posted on 13-7-2007 @ 09:01 PM by DontTreadOnMe
I thought this would get more interest on ATS.

Here we have two of the high-profile democratic contenders for president having wha they thought was a private conversation. They think the field is too large and that there should be limits on who get to debate for the democrataic spot.
Nevermind that the election is not until a year from November.
Nevermind that it should be up to the candidates who gets to speak to the american electorate.

I saw the clip: every news channel was playing it today.
It was kind of sickening, the insincerity, the way they arrogantly spoke. The way they segued into a friendly convesation with other candidates.

But, don't take my word for it:


At least one democratic contender was NOT amused.
Kucinich angrily reacts to Clinton-Edwards exchange in Detroit
"Candidates, no matter how important or influential they perceive themselves to be, do not have and should not have the power to determine who is allowed to speak to the American public and who is not," Kucinich said in a statement released by his campaign.

The Edwards-Clinton exchange was picked up by several broadcasters on an open microphone after an NAACP forum in Detroit on Thursday. All eight Democratic candidates took part in the program, including Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Mike Gravel and Kucinich.



[edit on 13-7-2007 by DontTreadOnMe]



reply posted on 14-7-2007 @ 12:16 AM by MidnightDStroyer
Originally posted by Togetic
Should they be limiting the debates like this? On the one hand, by excluding voices, doesn't that offend democratic principles that our elections are supposed to embody?

Yep, you're right...Notice that, even though they didn't mention names to leave out of debates, they're all scared of
Ron Paul getting into Office next year...He's scaring both parties because he is serious about getting the Government back on the Constitutional track! McCain over-spent his "allowance" to put himself out of the running, but Clinton/Edwards claim that Ron Paul isn't serious about the campaign or debates?

[edit on 14-7-2007 by MidnightDStroyer]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^