It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pootie
Because ALL CAMERAS WERE CONFISCATED as you passed through MILITARY CHECKPOINTS BLOCKS FROM GROUND ZERO.
Most of the photos taken even by the FEMA guys are still being withheld.
Originally posted by Pootie
You know what I like about your post? You concede molten steel was at the sites. This is a big breakthrough at ATS.
Originally posted by earth2
Personaly I think concrete would absorb the heat and smother any fire down below. Besides for your theory to be valid first you have to prove there was molten steel.
Originally posted by Tiloke
Concrete would smother any fire.
But thats to those pesky laws I keep mentioning that state energy can neither be created or destroyed, the heat would remain.
Concrete doesn't work to "soak up the heat" that well, as I said before, thats why concrete homes pay less for heating and cooling. It would wok as an insulator keeping that heat semi-trapped until it could find a way to more easily dissipate.
Originally posted by Tiloke
Wow, I actually need to quote the first post in this thread. Do people read anything other than the title before posting?
Originally posted by Pootie
You seem stuck on the fact that energy must change forms but then you ignore all of the forms it was taking up in this scenario.
Originally posted by VicRH
I agree, since when do coat hangers turn to molten metal through that sort of effect through bending? Sure it will heat up but it doesnt melt! They snap.
Fatigue (material)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In materials science, fatigue is the progressive, localised, and permanent structural damage that occurs when a material is subjected to cyclic or fluctuating strains at nominal stresses that have maximum values less than (often much less than) the static yield strength of the material. The resulting stress is thus below the ultimate tensile stress, and may be below the yield stress of the material, yet still cause structural failure.
Originally posted by ferretman2
Pootie - you obviously were not in NYC. within 2 weeks I could 'walk' by the trade center. There were no 'military' check points.
Originally posted by Tiloke
Dr. Love, this thread is about the molten steel. Please do not use the "ignore that, look over here" technique.
Originally posted by Tiloke
No, you seem to ignore the sheer amount of energy that was involved. The amount of energy released has been compared to a small earthquake or a nuclear weapon. Do you really think that a few streams of water would make a difference against that kind of energy?
Originally posted by earth2
I think there was some hot coals under that building just like all other buildings that burned down.