It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The president didn't misuse his power. He exercised it, just as Clinton did and every president before him.
Are Canadian poitics so boring that Canadians have to spend time obsessing about cases as trivial as this one?
Democrats, I can understand. For seven years, they've been in a living hell. Every time the president poots, it's cause for impeachment.
Democrats hate president's with backbone.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I can't imagine why this case is so important to Americans, much less Canadians.
*snip*
Did I blame anyone for anything?
[edit on 2007/7/9 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Are Canadian poitics so boring that Canadians have to spend time obsessing about cases as trivial as this one?
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I can't imagine why this case is so important to Americans, much less Canadians.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
You can comment till the cows come home for all I care, but I still can't figure out why you or any person outside the US would bother to even lift a finger to comment on this sideshow.
Originally posted by semperfortis
WHY is it all of a sudden an issue? I can answer that, because you all hate the man..
The fact that he has pardoned and commuted FAR less than MOST sitting presidents is a VALID point to be brought up when you are lynching the man for doing EXACTLY what is considered common practice in the White House... and doing FAR FAR less of it...
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
The president didn't misuse his power.
Originally posted by loam
Play the Clinton game all you want.
This situation is VERY different.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpottWhat was this about the blame game? Did I blame anyone for anything?
Lead Belly's boastful spirit and penchant for the occasional skirmish sometimes led him into trouble with the law, and in January 1918 he was thrown into a Dallas, Texas prison for the second time, this time after killing one of his relatives, Will Stafford, in a fight. It is said that he was released two years into his 35 year sentence after writing a song appealing to Governor Pat Morris Neff for his freedom. Lead Belly had swayed Governor Neff by appealing to his strong religious values. That, in combination with good behavior (including entertaining by playing for the guards and fellow prisoners), was Ledbetter's ticket out of jail.
In 1930, Lead Belly was back in prison, this time in Louisiana for attempted homicide. It was there, three years later, that he was "discovered" by musicologists John and Alan Lomax, who were enchanted by his talent, passion and singularity as a performer, and recorded hundreds of his songs on portable recording equipment for the Library of Congress. The following year Lead Belly was once again pardoned, this time after a petition for his early release was taken to Louisiana Governor O.K. Allen by the Lomaxes. The petition was on the other side of a recording of one of his most popular songs, "Goodnight Irene". But records show he was released due to good behavior, and mention nothing of the song.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Originally posted by loam
Play the Clinton game all you want.
This situation is VERY different.
I have never played the Clinton game.
Originally posted by jsobecky Back to Marc Rich: his wife gave $400,000 to the Clinton library, $10,000 to his legal defense fund, and $70,000 to Hillary's campaign fund. Pardon's ain't cheap, you know.
Originally posted by loam
How did you come by this special knowledge?
Clearly if an decision cant be defended on its merits there is something wrong. Semper if your so sure that people coming out against Bush decision on the basis of hatred then you should be able to defend the decision based on its merit.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I have no special knowledge.
It's all explained right here:
usgovinfo.about.com...
Originally posted by loam
Read my links and tell me if you agree.
Originally posted by dgtempe
There is no precedent for what Bush is doing.
He pardons Libby, or others in his immediate cabinet and IT IS NOT the same as past presidents who have the power to pardon some serious criminals out there but were outside of their inner circle.
Originally posted by intrepid
Guess what Grady, we aren't uneducated and we actually know what's going on in the world.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I read one of your links and I don't agree that the president should be impeached. Enough evidence might arise eventually to persuade me, but I'm not just dying to see the president impeached as so many are.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
My guess is that the president will not be impeached
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
and if he is impeached he will not be removed from office
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
and that by the year 2010, no one will be able to pick Valerie Plame or "Scooter" Libby out of a line up.