It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Methuselah
Cosmic, Stellar, Chemical, Organic and Macro dont happen. they cant. its theoretically impossible.
Once again, they are all theoretically very possible, and probable, and most likely. Just because you don't understand the principal doesn't mean it's not true. Remember your Boyle's law misunderstanding?
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
1. All mankind came from Adam and Eve whom God created about 6000 years ago.
OR
2. All mankind came from a rock about 3-4.5 billion years ago.
Source: Stone Edition Tanach, p. 3
In the beginning of God's creating the heavens and the earth - when the earth was astonishingly empty, with darkness upon the surface of the deep, and the Divine Presence hovered upon the surface of the waters - God said, "Let there be light," and there was light.
Source: Stone Edition Tanach, Footnote 1:1, Page 2-3
The phrase [in Hebrew, sorry, don't have a Hebrew font on this PC] is commonly rendered In the beginning God created, which would indicate that the Torah is giving the sequence of Creation - that God created the heaven, the earth, darkness, water, light, and so on. However, Rashi and Ibn Ezra maintain that this verse cannot be chronological; our translation follows their view.
Originally posted by Methuselah
I for one don't fault you in any way, shape or form for your beliefs. It's fine to believe in whatever or whoever you like as part of your faith. I think the problem begins when people try to preach their faith and beliefs as FACT and want proven sciences replaced with said unproven beliefs.
no the problem comes when people challenge others to prove to them their god and then reject any and all answers that are given.
How does anyone honestly question evolution? I mean, seriously.
I can see someone questioning HOW evolution happens. But IF it happens? Come on..
the question of how and if are one in the same.
like ive said before, micro evolution (variation within species/kinds) happens.
all others do not.
Cosmic, Stellar, Chemical, Organic and Macro dont happen. they cant. its theoretically impossible.
Macroevolution does happen.
Just because Evolution is FACT doesn't mean you still can't believe in a god.
If you believe it's theoretically impossible, show/prove why it is not possible.
Here's a thought also, maybe god created the universe to evolve. Wouldn't that be much more of a masterpiece then simply creating a bunch of people in his image a few thousand years ago. Creating a universe to evolve with such intricacy would be something an omnipotent being would do, don't you think????
Evolution as a whole has been proven on many levels. That is the way it is... You don't have to like it but you can't change FACT.
Originally posted by aZiXx
For those who think they can prove macro-evolution of species (i.e. creating new ones) via science, please do so. No one has been able to prove it as of yet. There are theories abound, but no proof.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
Originally posted by aZiXx
For those who think they can prove macro-evolution of species (i.e. creating new ones) via science, please do so. No one has been able to prove it as of yet. There are theories abound, but no proof.
Sure there is. The fossil record is littered with intermediate types on their way from one species to another, being an intermediate species themselves.
Archaeopteryx is the prime example.
The only reason you can't see macroevolution in action is that it moves at the geological time scale and we just don't live long enough to witness it.
Originally posted by MajorMalfunction
The fossil record is littered with intermediate types on their way from one species to another, being an intermediate species themselves.
Originally posted by aZiXx
Well that's a new species, you may call it intermediate if you want. So how did it come into being from the dinosaur into the bird? Was it a dinosaur for millions of years, and then it was this species all of a sudden, then millions of years later it evolved into a bird? It seems like quite a big leep for a mother to give offspring of such a great difference from regular offspring.
Originally posted by Clearskies
Where are the actual archaeopteryx specimens???
Here's a site (non christian) with unbiased Facts about "archy". Archaeopteryx a fraud?
Originally posted by aZiXx
Or is it that there are many intermediate species between major groups like dinosaurs and birds that allow for a smooth transition from one to the next? In that case, there must be more fossil record for evidence of this, unless it's just an assumption that there are more intermediates.
Maybe we just haven't found fossils yet, could be, but I don't think many more will be found.
Archaeopteryx lithographica would be another species among many in the great design of things that change over time. That is a type of evolution, but not in the sense of old species giving birth to new ones. That evolution is not logical from my understanding.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
I don't believe in creationism, especially in the biblical sense. But I don't think scientists have the big bang right either. I think the source is something that is beyond our comprehension just like the universe is infinite. We can't wrap our brains around it.