It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
Originally posted by lightseeker
I wish Justin Oldham was involved in this thread. Justin, if you read this, please post your thoughts and ideas and any other actions that I may not have thought of.
So, there I was, minding my own business (I have a witness), and I felt this tremor in the force....so here I am.
Originally posted by jhanks28cold
Fox news also just reported that Bush has chosen to invoke "executive privilege" in order to keep the two former aides from testifying. I actually started a new thread in response here, as I don't want to derail this thread in response.
Originally posted by lightseeker
This move by the White House to block the damaging testimony by a former WH aide should come as no surprise to anyone who has been following the story. The Bush camp has been continuously and consistantly impeding any investigation into what the real motives were for the White Houses' firings of seven U.S. Attorneys.
The underlying reason for the firings was of course strictly a partisan, political ploy to insert more "right thinking" attorneys into positions of influence, thereby effectively guaranteeing that the Bush agenda is always and consistantly represented. Now, Bush is trying to either impede or possibly subborn the testimony of someone who's words could really spell trouble for the White House.
news.yahoo.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 7/8/2007 by lightseeker]
The Senate Judiciary Committee wants to hear from Sara Taylor at its hearing Wednesday and she is willing to talk. Testifying, however, would defy the wishes of the president, "a person whom she admires and for whom she has worked tirelessly for years," lawyer W. Neil Eggleston said.
Originally posted by lightseeker
Also, I have seen some of your posts, forestlady, and you handle a keyboard pretty well, yourself.
Originally posted by marg6043
The only way to save our system of government from the corruption that has taken over is to impeach the president and the vice president.
Originally posted by forestlady
Originally posted by lightseeker
Also, I have seen some of your posts, forestlady, and you handle a keyboard pretty well, yourself.
(Blushes)...
OK that does it, you're going on my "friends' list, Lightseeker.
Thanks to you also!
Originally posted by TheLoony
Does it matter if I am a registered voter or not when sending letters to elected officials? I'm registered in Nevada but haven't lived there in years. Since leaving there I haven't really been in one place long enough to re-register. I can now but not sure if I'm going to be in this state when my lease is up at the end of the year. Since that's only five months away I'm not sure if it's worth it.
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
All of this pays off when we go to the polls. We may very well be choosing the lesser of two evils...but that can change if better people run for office. Evil succeeds when good men do nothing, and its always easier to say, "it won't work" than it is to get your hands dirty with this nasty problem.
If you wrote and phoned already, tell everyone that you did it and encourge them to do it, too. It's a numbers things. If enough of us register our disapproval, we will be heard. If we vote to make change in large numbers, we will be heard. If we embrace negative thinking, they win. Which would make them feel pretty good about themselves.
[edit on 9-7-2007 by Justin Oldham]
Source
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush directed former aides to defy congressional subpoenas on Monday, claiming executive privilege and prodding lawmakers closer to their first contempt citations against administration officials since Ronald Reagan was president.
It was the second time in as many weeks that Bush had cited executive privilege in resisting Congress' investigation into the firings of U.S. attorneys.
Originally posted by Justin Oldham
So, there I was, minding my own business (I have a witness), and I felt this tremor in the force....so here I am.
Originally posted by jhanks28cold
Fox news also just reported that Bush has chosen to invoke "executive privilege" in order to keep the two former aides from testifying. I actually started a new thread in response here, as I don't want to derail this thread in response.
Originally posted by Project_Silo
What can we do to get these criminals the justice they deserve?its not like were all gonna get together and protest,far to many poeple are "to busy" for such a action..
Source: Supreme Law Firm
Specifically, laws governing the federal courts authorize parties to compel answers to SUBPOENAs, and to move those courts for sanctions such as contempt of court. Recently, another member of President George Bush’s cabinet was held in contempt by a federal district court; thus, ample court precedent exists to hold O’Neill (Secretary of the Treasury) in contempt of court ‑‑ for not answering (to specific supeonas concerning the illegality of the IRS & the Income Tax Codes). Only time will tell if such contempt proceedings will escalate to the level of a criminal investigation.
On a much broader scale, the absence of liability statutes raises the specter of widespread government fraud, going all the way back to the year 1913. And, there is no statute of limitations on fraud.
Originally posted by marg6043
The only way to save our system of government from the corruption that has taken over is to impeach the president and the vice president.
Originally posted by dawnstar
alot of events seem to fly under the news media's radar. I think we all have noticed this. important events, like the planning of the amero and such.