Hillary Clinton supports the NWO? YES!

the video speaks for itself! nothing to add actually...

but it doesn't matter if you vote for her or not, because all the other candidates (except Ron Paul *maybe* -_-) are trying to achieve the same goal... a world controlled by a global government body! (NWO)

[edit on 24/6/07 by EBE154]

[edit on 24/6/07 by EBE154]

vote for me, just write my name on you ballot, maybe if I get enough votes I can run as an independent. BTW I am against a NWO and for a FWO (Free world order) I want to bannish all money, and forced labor, and no taxes! Everyone will be free if you vote for me!!!!!

yea, I've seen that video. Her and Bill have been pursuing that agenda for YEARS. If hillary were to win the election if somehow America makes it that far it would be BAD news as she is a chief sponsor for the horrible things that we've come to believe are coming.

She looks mind controlled. It's spooky...

Originally posted by parry noid
vote for me, just write my name on you ballot, maybe if I get enough votes I can run as an independent. BTW I am against a NWO and for a FWO (Free world order) I want to bannish all money, and forced labor, and no taxes! Everyone will be free if you vote for me!!!!!

You've convinced me, I'll vote for you!!!

or vote for me....so i can make lil flip secretary of the treasury

Scary... :S

So let me ask what may seem a naive question: who do they believe are to lead the world then? I know they say democratic leadership, but comeon... we know that is bs.

I would gladly go to arms against them if the american government would try to take control over such a "democratic" rule of the world.

I'm sure she does.

Out of all of them, do you suppose there is one who doesnt???

I watched this whole video a couple months ago. This type of stuff should be on EVERY major news channel so the people could hear the truth.

Bush and Clinton are the same. There is no difference between the last 3 leaders of our country and the current favorite to be our leader. If Hillary is elected, we are screwed.

VOTE RON PAUL!!!!!! Get organized and fight the NWO.

She not only supports the NWO, she is the NWO!

Originally posted by djohnsto77
She not only supports the NWO, she is the NWO!

And who is not???

Agreed.

Hillary is extremely devoted to the NWO. I doubt she'd be so energetically power mongering if it were just to be QUEEN of the USA.

She'd prefer the world but realizes the Anti-Christ has that slow wrapped up.

Her public statements about supporting socialist/globalist goals such as

WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THINGS AWAY FROM YOU and give them to others

and the like are quite telling.

But somehow, the electorate has been dumbed down sooooo extensively, the Klintoons can get away with

1. selling missile secrets to China for personal gain with impunity.
2. selling nuke secrets to China for personal gain with impunity.

3. violating campaign finance laws with impunity though there is a court case slowly progressing with a video proving her feloneous statements that could get interesting before the election.

4. then there's all the reputed bodies from Vince Foster, Ron Brown on et al . . . including the clear bullet hole in Ron Brown's head that had to happen BEFORE the plane crashed. Being a Friend of Bill And . . . she who should not be named or mentioned--is not a good predicter of longevity.

. . . So, yeah, I'd say she's vigorously in support of the NWO, reared up like Bill by them; trained by them; had the skids greased by the NWO folks for them etc. etc. etc.

But, also, right about the other candidates. PERHAPS Duncan Hunter is different. Had somehopes for FredThompson . . . then heard he's a member of CFR.

Sigh.

Well, she is fighting for free health care too. At least that was reality before corporate people silenced her.

Some social elements are needed today or else majority of people will enjoy poverty and hunger without end. After we help them they can contribute back. Also, if USA and EU can cooperate internally and live in prosperity we can conclude united world would be similar in nature.

Originally posted by acegotflows
yea, I've seen that video. Her and Bill have been pursuing that agenda for YEARS. If hillary were to win the election if somehow America makes it that far it would be BAD news as she is a chief sponsor for the horrible things that we've come to believe are coming.

She looks mind controlled. It's spooky...

Man, I have to agree about the mind-controlled expression...sure hope she doesn't win the presidency....I didn't know she had NWO tendencies!

How much does Hillary support the empowerment of the UN, I heard she does.

Wasnt our economy a lot stronger when Bill was in office?
Seems like things have been going down hill ever since Bush took the presidency. I kinda liked it when Bill was president.

Wikipedia has an article on the World Federalist Movement:

en.wikipedia.org...

World Federalist Movement website, propagates virtues of world federal government:

www.wfm.org...

Anyone supports the ideas of the World Federal Movement to form a world federal government based on peace, justice and prosperity?

[edit on 27-6-2007 by Ickey]

In his June 21 column, Larry J. Sabato, the director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia wrote that the possibility of no one but Bushes and Clintons in the White House from 1989 to 2017 is a "national disgrace." Sabato stated:

A much more reasonable criticism is directly related to the dominating presence of Hillary Clinton in this election cycle. The population of the United States now exceeds 300 million, and the talent pool of the world's only superpower is deep and rich. How is it that the country is on the verge of filling its highest office for the sixth consecutive term from one of two families? That every President from 1989 to 2017 may be a Bush or a Clinton is a national disgrace. What has happened to the American Republic? How does it differ from a banana republic -- where a couple of dominant families often run everything for generations? Have we driven the vast majority of the potentially best Presidents out of the contest because of the high personal and professional costs of running for office? Are we the voters responsible because we are too lazy to go beyond the simplistic attractions of familiarity and high name identification? Or, most disturbing of all, has our political system become ossified, so that we are too fearful of change to seek out the most outstanding leaders among us for the toughest job in the world?

This is from www.mediamatters.org and what Sabato has to say is so very true. The end of the republic looms on the horizon.